REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey on the Robustness of Computer Vision Models against Common Corruptions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The performance of computer vision models are susceptible to unexpected changes in input images caused by sensor errors or extreme imaging environments, known as common corruptions (e.g. noise, blur, illumination changes). These corruptions can significantly hinder the reliability of these models when deployed in real-world scenarios, yet they are often overlooked when testing model generalization and robustness. In this survey, we present a comprehensive overview of methods that improve the robustness of computer vision models against common corruptions. We categorize methods into three groups based on the model components and training methods they target: data augmentation, learning strategies, and network components. We release a unified benchmark framework (available at \url{https://github.com/nis-research/CorruptionBenchCV}) to compare robustness performance across several datasets, and we address the inconsistencies of evaluation practices in the literature. Our experimental analysis highlights the base corruption robustness of popular vision backbones, revealing that corruption robustness does not necessarily scale with model size and data size. Large models gain negligible robustness improvements, considering the increased computational requirements. To achieve generalizable and robust computer vision models, we foresee the need of developing new learning strategies that efficiently exploit limited data and mitigate unreliable learning behaviors.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
RT-VLM: Re-Thinking Vision Language Model with 4-Clues for Real-World Object Recognition Robustness
Fine-tuning a vision-language model on a synthetic 4-clue dataset and adding a self-critique inference loop improves robustness to domain shifts in object recognition.
-
Look Within or Look Beyond? A Theoretical Comparison Between Parameter-Efficient and Full Fine-Tuning
The paper claims PEFT is a strict, less robust, lower-capacity subset of full fine-tuning, but the mathematical proofs contain load-bearing errors and the experiments, while suggestive, cannot repair them.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.