Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Mobile-Env: Building Qualified Evaluation Benchmarks for LLM-GUI Interaction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.08144 v4 pith:XKENEIE6 submitted 2023-05-14 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords benchmarksmodelsmobile-envevaluationsadvancedagentscomprehensivecontrollable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Graphical User Interface (GUI) is pivotal for human interaction with the digital world, enabling efficient device control and the completion of complex tasks. Recent progress in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision Language Models (VLMs) offers the chance to create advanced GUI agents. To ensure their effectiveness, there's a pressing need for qualified benchmarks that provide trustworthy and reproducible evaluations -- a challenge current benchmarks often fail to address. To tackle this issue, we introduce Mobile-Env, a comprehensive toolkit tailored for creating GUI benchmarks in the Android mobile environment. Mobile-Env offers an isolated and controllable setting for reliable evaluations, and accommodates intermediate instructions and rewards to reflect real-world usage more naturally. Utilizing Mobile-Env, we collect an open-world task set across various real-world apps and a fixed world set, WikiHow, which captures a significant amount of dynamic online contents for fully controllable and reproducible evaluation. We conduct comprehensive evaluations of LLM agents using these benchmarks. Our findings reveal that even advanced models (e.g., GPT-4V and LLaMA-3) struggle with tasks that are relatively simple for humans. This highlights a crucial gap in current models and underscores the importance of developing more capable foundation models and more effective GUI agent frameworks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MobiBench: Multi-Branch, Modular Benchmark for Mobile GUI Agents

    cs.AI 2025-12 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    MobiBench reaches near-human offline evaluation fidelity for mobile GUI agents by accepting any valid action at each step, and enables modular attribution of performance to agent components.

  2. MobiAgent: A Systematic Framework for Customizable Mobile Agents

    cs.MA 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A full-stack mobile agent framework reports state-of-the-art task completion on its own DAG-based benchmark and 2-3x speedups from replaying recorded trajectories.

  3. SafeMobile: Chain-level Jailbreak Detection and Automated Evaluation for Multimodal Mobile Agents

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A history-aware guard model with an LLM judge is reported to cut jailbreak success on mobile agent tasks from 86.1% to 8.4% while keeping task completion unchanged at 77.8%.

  4. Edge-Based Multimodal Sensor Data Fusion with Vision Language Models (VLMs) for Real-time Autonomous Vehicle Accident Avoidance

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A lightweight vision-language model on an edge device fuses roadside hazard alerts with onboard camera views to adjust trajectories, and the authors report a 77% simulated collision reduction over a vision-only baseline.

  5. Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A review that proposes a two-dimensional taxonomy for evaluating LLM agents and highlights enterprise-specific evaluation gaps.

  6. Evolutionary Perspectives on the Evaluation of LLM-Based AI Agents: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that classifies AI agent evaluation benchmarks along environment and capability axes, and proposes five traits that distinguish agents from chatbots.

Pith tools