Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

Jet Diffusion versus JetGPT -- Modern Networks for the LHC

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.10475 v3 pith:VYVA2O72 submitted 2023-05-17 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords diffusionmodelsnetworksautoregressivedifferentphysicstrainingtransformer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce two diffusion models and an autoregressive transformer for LHC physics simulations. Bayesian versions allow us to control the networks and capture training uncertainties. After illustrating their different density estimation methods for simple toy models, we discuss their advantages for Z plus jets event generation. While diffusion networks excel through their precision, the transformer scales best with the phase space dimensionality. Given the different training and evaluation speed, we expect LHC physics to benefit from dedicated use cases for normalizing flows, diffusion models, and autoregressive transformers.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Generative models on phase space

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    Generative diffusion and flow models are constructed to remain exactly on the Lorentz-invariant massless N-particle phase space manifold during sampling for particle physics applications.

  2. Neural Control Variates at LO and NLO

    hep-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Signed neural control variates from normalizing flows, combined with neural importance sampling, reduce weight ranges and negative weights for LO and NLO phase-space integration and event generation.

  3. Learning Standard Model structure from LHC data with Riemannian flow matching

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    ShellFlow, a Riemannian flow-matching transformer fed only on-shell and invariant-mass priors and ~8×10^8 recorded ATLAS events, reproduces the SM's dilepton resonances, Weinberg angle, and top/W mass peaks in a singl...

  4. Local Conformal Predictions for Calibrated Surrogates

    hep-ph 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    FALCON is a novel conformal prediction technique that learns locally calibrated confidence intervals for neural network surrogates modeling LHC scattering amplitudes.

  5. Nested-GPT for variable-multiplicity parton showers: A case study in the resummation of non-global logarithms

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Nested-GPT is an autoregressive Transformer surrogate that generates variable-multiplicity parton showers while enforcing ordered Markovian branching and matches reference Monte Carlo results for leading-log non-globa...

  6. Nested-GPT for variable-multiplicity parton showers: A case study in the resummation of non-global logarithms

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Nested-GPT is an autoregressive Transformer that dynamically generates variable-multiplicity parton showers matching Monte Carlo references for non-global logarithm resummation in the large-Nc limit.

  7. Agentic Re-Casting using Agentic Re-Simulations

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An agentic AI system with a physicist in the loop re-casts an ATLAS ttZ measurement into a global top-quark SMEFT fit and recovers injected coloron Wilson coefficients in a repeatable benchmark.

  8. Forecasting Generative Amplification

    hep-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A KS-test-based differential method and a Bayesian averaging method estimate generative amplification without holdout datasets and find amplification in selected LHC phase-space regions.

  9. HEPTAPOD: Orchestrating High Energy Physics Workflows Towards Autonomous Agency

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    HEPTAPOD uses LLM agents to drive FeynRules, MadGraph, Pythia, and analysis tools through schema-validated tool calls and run-card templates, demonstrated on a leptoquark signal scan.

  10. Amplitude Uncertainties Everywhere All at Once

    hep-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Compares ensemble, Bayesian, and evidential regression approaches for uncertainty quantification in amplitude surrogates and shows they detect localized training data issues.

Pith tools