Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Neural Machine Translation for Code Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.13504 v1 pith:5NXJ2FFW submitted 2023-05-22 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords codemethodsbeengenerationlanguagetranslationinputnatural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Neural machine translation (NMT) methods developed for natural language processing have been shown to be highly successful in automating translation from one natural language to another. Recently, these NMT methods have been adapted to the generation of program code. In NMT for code generation, the task is to generate output source code that satisfies constraints expressed in the input. In the literature, a variety of different input scenarios have been explored, including generating code based on natural language description, lower-level representations such as binary or assembly (neural decompilation), partial representations of source code (code completion and repair), and source code in another language (code translation). In this paper we survey the NMT for code generation literature, cataloging the variety of methods that have been explored according to input and output representations, model architectures, optimization techniques used, data sets, and evaluation methods. We discuss the limitations of existing methods and future research directions

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Leveraging LLMs for Legacy Code Modernization: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Generated Documentation

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    On legacy MUMPS code, LLM-generated line comments are rated almost as good as human-written ones; on IBM assembly they are rated low, and standard automated metrics do not predict human quality scores.

Pith tools