Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Interpretation of Time-Series Deep Models: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.14582 v1 pith:MKJJNU27 submitted 2023-05-23 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords modelstime-seriesinterpretationmethodsdeepfutureinterpretabilitypost-hoc
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning models developed for time-series associated tasks have become more widely researched nowadays. However, due to the unintuitive nature of time-series data, the interpretability problem -- where we understand what is under the hood of these models -- becomes crucial. The advancement of similar studies in computer vision has given rise to many post-hoc methods, which can also shed light on how to explain time-series models. In this paper, we present a wide range of post-hoc interpretation methods for time-series models based on backpropagation, perturbation, and approximation. We also want to bring focus onto inherently interpretable models, a novel category of interpretation where human-understandable information is designed within the models. Furthermore, we introduce some common evaluation metrics used for the explanations, and propose several directions of future researches on the time-series interpretability problem. As a highlight, our work summarizes not only the well-established interpretation methods, but also a handful of fairly recent and under-developed techniques, which we hope to capture their essence and spark future endeavours to innovate and improvise.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Time Series Foundation Models for Multivariate Financial Time Series Forecasting

    q-fin.GN 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pretrained TTM shows large transfer and sample-efficiency gains in three financial forecasting tasks relative to training from scratch, but methodological flaws including possible look-ahead bias weaken the quantitati...

  2. TIMING: Temporality-Aware Integrated Gradients for Time Series Explanation

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    TIMING, a segment-masked variant of Integrated Gradients, together with two cumulative metrics (CPD and CPP), is claimed to improve time series explanations, but only under the paper's own metrics.

Pith tools