Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Mixture-of-Experts Meets Instruction Tuning:A Winning Combination for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.14705 v2 pith:M56GCB7R submitted 2023-05-24 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsinstructiontuningtasksdownstreamfinetuninglanguagedense
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) is a neural architecture design that can be utilized to add learnable parameters to Large Language Models (LLMs) without increasing inference cost. Instruction tuning is a technique for training LLMs to follow instructions. We advocate combining these two approaches, as we find that MoE models benefit more from instruction tuning than dense models. In particular, we conduct empirical studies across three experimental setups: (i) Direct finetuning on individual downstream tasks devoid of instruction tuning; (ii) Instructiontuning followed by in-context few-shot or zero-shot generalization on downstream tasks; and (iii) Instruction tuning supplemented by further finetuning on individual downstream tasks. In the first scenario, MoE models overall underperform dense models of identical computational capacity. This narrative, however, dramatically changes with the introduction of instruction tuning (second and third scenario), used independently or in conjunction with task-specific finetuning. Our most powerful model, FLAN-MOE-32B, surpasses the performance of FLAN-PALM-62B on four benchmark tasks, while using only a third of the FLOPs. The advancements embodied byFLAN-MOE inspire a reevaluation of the design principles of large-scale, high-performance language models in the framework of task-agnostic learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 20 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Refine Knowledge of Large Language Models via Adaptive Contrastive Learning

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An adaptive contrastive learning strategy that uses a model's own sampled response accuracy to create per-region positive and negative training pairs improves LLM truthful rate by up to 6.9% over IDK-SFT.

  2. APT: Improving Specialist LLM Performance with Weakness Case Acquisition and Iterative Preference Training

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    APT trains a model on its own wrong answers plus retrieved similar answers using iterative DPO with SFT loss, improving math, code, and instruction-following while keeping general benchmarks about flat.

  3. Decoding Knowledge Attribution in Mixture-of-Experts: A Framework of Basic-Refinement Collaboration and Efficiency Analysis

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    An empirical study proposing a 'basic-refinement' split in MoE models, where shared experts generalize and routed experts specialize, with efficiency claims undermined by internally inconsistent numbers and an unvalid...

Pith tools