REVIEW 3 cited by
Is GPT-4 a Good Data Analyst?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their powerful capabilities in plenty of domains and tasks, including context understanding, code generation, language generation, data storytelling, etc., many data analysts may raise concerns if their jobs will be replaced by artificial intelligence (AI). This controversial topic has drawn great attention in public. However, we are still at a stage of divergent opinions without any definitive conclusion. Motivated by this, we raise the research question of "is GPT-4 a good data analyst?" in this work and aim to answer it by conducting head-to-head comparative studies. In detail, we regard GPT-4 as a data analyst to perform end-to-end data analysis with databases from a wide range of domains. We propose a framework to tackle the problems by carefully designing the prompts for GPT-4 to conduct experiments. We also design several task-specific evaluation metrics to systematically compare the performance between several professional human data analysts and GPT-4. Experimental results show that GPT-4 can achieve comparable performance to humans. We also provide in-depth discussions about our results to shed light on further studies before reaching the conclusion that GPT-4 can replace data analysts.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
PlotGen: Multi-Agent LLM-based Scientific Data Visualization via Multimodal Feedback
PlotGen, a five-agent LLM system, improves automated scientific chart generation by adding numeric, lexical, and visual feedback to iteratively fix plotting errors.
-
A Survey on Large Language Models with some Insights on their Capabilities and Limitations
A broad survey of LLM methods and applications, plus an empirical section on how code-rich pretraining may influence chain-of-thought reasoning, the details of which are not visible in the supplied text.
-
Integrating LLMs with ITS: Recent Advances, Potentials, Challenges, and Future Directions
The paper surveys recent work, models, applications, and challenges of using LLMs in intelligent transportation systems, without presenting new experimental results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.