REVIEW 2 cited by
On the Generalization and Approximation Capacities of Neural Controlled Differential Equations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Neural Controlled Differential Equations (NCDEs) are a state-of-the-art tool for supervised learning with irregularly sampled time series (Kidger, 2020). However, no theoretical analysis of their performance has been provided yet, and it remains unclear in particular how the irregularity of the time series affects their predictions. By merging the rich theory of controlled differential equations (CDE) and Lipschitz-based measures of the complexity of deep neural nets, we take a first step towards the theoretical understanding of NCDE. Our first result is a generalization bound for this class of predictors that depends on the regularity of the time series data. In a second time, we leverage the continuity of the flow of CDEs to provide a detailed analysis of both the sampling-induced bias and the approximation bias. Regarding this last result, we show how classical approximation results on neural nets may transfer to NCDEs. Our theoretical results are validated through a series of experiments.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Generalization Bound for a General Class of Neural Ordinary Differential Equations
Claims a first generalization bound for nonlinear neural ODEs, but bounds the complexity of time trajectories rather than input-output maps, leaving the main theorem unproven.
-
Time Resolution Independent Operator Learning
A DeepONet with a neural controlled differential equation branch and a trunk that takes space and time as inputs predicts transient mechanical fields from load histories at arbitrary spatiotemporal query points.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.