Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improving Handwritten OCR with Training Samples Generated by Glyph Conditional Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.19543 v1 pith:QHRNKUGC submitted 2023-05-31 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords samplestraininghandwrittenmodeldataglyphimagesconditional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Constructing a highly accurate handwritten OCR system requires large amounts of representative training data, which is both time-consuming and expensive to collect. To mitigate the issue, we propose a denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) to generate training samples. This model conditions on a printed glyph image and creates mappings between printed characters and handwritten images, thus enabling the generation of photo-realistic handwritten samples with diverse styles and unseen text contents. However, the text contents in synthetic images are not always consistent with the glyph conditional images, leading to unreliable labels of synthetic samples. To address this issue, we further propose a progressive data filtering strategy to add those samples with a high confidence of correctness to the training set. Experimental results on IAM benchmark task show that OCR model trained with augmented DDPM-synthesized training samples can achieve about 45% relative word error rate reduction compared with the one trained on real data only.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Advancing Offline Handwritten Text Recognition: A Systematic Review of Data Augmentation and Generation Techniques

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A systematic review of offline handwritten text recognition augmentation and generation methods, whose claimed 55-paper corpus is contradicted by its own figures and reference list.

Pith tools