Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 27 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2306.00622.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2306.00622 v1

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 27 of 27 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00

measured 27 of 27 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T19:10:00.689487Z

measured 1 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy0
unresolved0
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

27
arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation a12246f8-e5ae-49f4-bc5f-5e4a60fec465 · inbound

Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews cites this paper.

Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 8

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-24T02:48:47.468986Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 1fea0a82-127f-441c-9167-8ae1483614cf · inbound

Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Artificially Generated Scientific Research cites this paper.

Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Artificially Generated Scientific Research ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 26

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T19:10:00.689487Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 38603b02-d79c-4685-9479-5a41f3a8f66a · inbound

SC4ANM: Identifying Optimal Section Combinations for Automated Novelty Prediction in Academic Papers cites this paper.

SC4ANM: Identifying Optimal Section Combinations for Automated Novelty Prediction in Academic Papers ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 21

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:05:26.293474Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a1a7b485-b4bb-4206-8f05-8f91042d8d1e · inbound

OpenReview Should be Protected and Leveraged as a Community Asset for Research in the Era of Large Language Models cites this paper.

OpenReview Should be Protected and Leveraged as a Community Asset for Research in the Era of Large Language Models ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 42

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T14:31:37.220322Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation df4af3dc-1bef-41f4-b771-cd3ac5fe10c2 · inbound

Position: The ML Community Must Build an AI-Augmented Peer-Review Ecosystem cites this paper.

Position: The ML Community Must Build an AI-Augmented Peer-Review Ecosystem ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 28

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T05:22:49.550961Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 5998f763-07a6-4560-a65c-4788e8dff6b8 · inbound

Can LLMs Identify Critical Limitations within Scientific Research? A Systematic Evaluation on AI Research Papers cites this paper.

Can LLMs Identify Critical Limitations within Scientific Research? A Systematic Evaluation on AI Research Papers ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 19

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T20:28:56.785071Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d6dcbfee-d640-4194-b1da-3e52a94fb6b3 · inbound

Automated Novelty Evaluation of Academic Paper: A Collaborative Approach Integrating Human and Large Language Model Knowledge cites this paper.

Automated Novelty Evaluation of Academic Paper: A Collaborative Approach Integrating Human and Large Language Model Knowledge ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 36

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:15:44.839969Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 27984cf5-3d62-4242-9bbb-01a1b44f03ab · inbound

How Far Are AI Scientists from Changing the World? cites this paper.

How Far Are AI Scientists from Changing the World? ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 107

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T10:55:14.882360Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a1d2fc63-9b84-48e0-901c-b62912670dff · inbound

Are Today's LLMs Ready to Explain Well-Being Concepts? cites this paper.

Are Today's LLMs Ready to Explain Well-Being Concepts? ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 30

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T01:02:51.054113Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 19de3f25-27ae-4777-8ae2-865858fa2382 · inbound

ShinkaEvolve: Towards Open-Ended And Sample-Efficient Program Evolution cites this paper.

ShinkaEvolve: Towards Open-Ended And Sample-Efficient Program Evolution ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 115

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-16T13:58:58.851875Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation d3ac6bf1-1659-4192-908a-4df8a3682f4d · inbound

BadScientist: Can a Research Agent Write Convincing but Unsound Papers that Fool LLM Reviewers? cites this paper.

BadScientist: Can a Research Agent Write Convincing but Unsound Papers that Fool LLM Reviewers? ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 21

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-04T08:59:48.280504Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation bd51ae98-02d0-4aa4-ad49-1c20bf31caa5 · inbound

LLMs, You Can Evaluate It! Design of Multi-perspective Report Evaluation for Security Operation Centers cites this paper.

LLMs, You Can Evaluate It! Design of Multi-perspective Report Evaluation for Security Operation Centers ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 49

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-16T17:03:08.132145Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 427fe1c5-e471-42f3-9155-9e854ec856f6 · inbound

AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilot cites this paper.

AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilot ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 17

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T13:00:24.448354Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 63376e88-234d-4b17-9fb0-6abed1a2f390 · inbound

Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI cites this paper.

Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 36

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T13:21:19.156161Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 4cb9225f-4915-4e74-871a-d1ba58438e1e · inbound

ARIS: Autonomous Research via Adversarial Multi-Agent Collaboration cites this paper.

ARIS: Autonomous Research via Adversarial Multi-Agent Collaboration ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 7

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-09T06:55:43.119225Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation c2869991-65d5-4093-aada-94be323fc43b · inbound

Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluation cites this paper.

Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluation ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-07-12T17:41:55.862596Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 2a7c90e9-8339-4d5b-8bb3-e3e5f273e882 · inbound

Jagged AI in Scientific Peer Review: Evidence from POMP Data Analysis cites this paper.

Jagged AI in Scientific Peer Review: Evidence from POMP Data Analysis ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 6

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T03:50:55.807340Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation f053806a-d954-476a-bb0b-01124c320c8c · inbound

Jagged AI in Scientific Peer Review: Evidence from POMP Data Analysis cites this paper.

Jagged AI in Scientific Peer Review: Evidence from POMP Data Analysis ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 9

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-20T22:53:49.008913Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 2ae939bc-d1c7-47f2-b886-69edc2ca618e · inbound

PaperMentor: A Human-Centered Multi-Agent Writing Tutor for AI Research Papers on Overleaf cites this paper.

PaperMentor: A Human-Centered Multi-Agent Writing Tutor for AI Research Papers on Overleaf ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 15

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-02T23:17:29.062504Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 511ca7c1-a0b4-4bb9-ad95-a935cf5cf9a7 · inbound

From Passive Generation to Investigation: A Proactive Scientific Peer Review Agent cites this paper.

From Passive Generation to Investigation: A Proactive Scientific Peer Review Agent ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 8

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-06-27T07:20:42.015360Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation c184dc36-7181-46db-9ef6-40af184246e7 · inbound

ReproRepo: Scaling Reproducibility Audits with GitHub Repository Issues cites this paper.

ReproRepo: Scaling Reproducibility Audits with GitHub Repository Issues ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 22

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-03T20:58:57.926512Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 79628527-336e-4230-b627-93832e94693e · inbound

Sakana Fugu Technical Report cites this paper.

Sakana Fugu Technical Report ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 151

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-04T06:29:38.198990Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation bb4a2352-61cc-4236-a6dd-ed370a064e69 · inbound

NatureBench: Can Coding Agents Match the Published SOTA of Nature-Family Papers? cites this paper.

NatureBench: Can Coding Agents Match the Published SOTA of Nature-Family Papers? ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 52

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-04T16:49:57.758615Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation c875e44c-730a-4b77-9197-829737b75da4 · inbound

NatureBench: Can Coding Agents Match the Published SOTA of Nature-Family Papers? cites this paper.

NatureBench: Can Coding Agents Match the Published SOTA of Nature-Family Papers? ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 52

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-07-12T12:32:39.706055Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 80e3f968-3ad2-4552-82d3-2c271e713e14 · inbound

Prompt Framing Distorts Count Based Evaluation of LLM Error Detection: Evidence from Numeric Anchoring cites this paper.

Prompt Framing Distorts Count Based Evaluation of LLM Error Detection: Evidence from Numeric Anchoring ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 6

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-04T01:59:24.759905Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

Observation 1842de19-41f2-4e4b-bdac-da9afebbda19 · inbound

AutoSupervision: Closing the Feedback Loop in Scientific Workflows with Grounded Revision Verification cites this paper.

AutoSupervision: Closing the Feedback Loop in Scientific Workflows with Grounded Revision Verification ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 11

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T00:25:09.763300Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 856ba543-d7a2-4d26-bf19-60ee6784b964 · inbound

Can AI Evaluate AI Scientists? A Benchmarking Study of Autonomous Research Generation Systems Using Automated Multi-Model Review cites this paper.

Can AI Evaluate AI Scientists? A Benchmarking Study of Autonomous Research Generation Systems Using Automated Multi-Model Review ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing

Reference 9

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-03T00:54:34.900318Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.