Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Federated Domain Generalization: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.01334 v2 pith:LON3E43Q submitted 2023-06-02 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords domaindatafederatedgeneralizationlearningdistributionsdomainsrecent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning typically relies on the assumption that training and testing distributions are identical and that data is centrally stored for training and testing. However, in real-world scenarios, distributions may differ significantly and data is often distributed across different devices, organizations, or edge nodes. Consequently, it is imperative to develop models that can effectively generalize to unseen distributions where data is distributed across different domains. In response to this challenge, there has been a surge of interest in federated domain generalization (FDG) in recent years. FDG combines the strengths of federated learning (FL) and domain generalization (DG) techniques to enable multiple source domains to collaboratively learn a model capable of directly generalizing to unseen domains while preserving data privacy. However, generalizing the federated model under domain shifts is a technically challenging problem that has received scant attention in the research area so far. This paper presents the first survey of recent advances in this area. Initially, we discuss the development process from traditional machine learning to domain adaptation and domain generalization, leading to FDG as well as provide the corresponding formal definition. Then, we categorize recent methodologies into four classes: federated domain alignment, data manipulation, learning strategies, and aggregation optimization, and present suitable algorithms in detail for each category. Next, we introduce commonly used datasets, applications, evaluations, and benchmarks. Finally, we conclude this survey by providing some potential research topics for the future.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Shift Happens - Confounding Is to Blame

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under hidden confounding shifts, predictive information reduces to conditional informativeness minus a residual, a result the authors use to explain ERM's surprising OOD competitiveness and the value of all-covariate models.

  2. Positive Style Accumulation: A Style Screening and Continuous Utilization Framework for Federated DG-ReID

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SSCU improves federated domain-generalizable person re-identification by screening styles with round-over-round Rank-1 gains and continuously training on the memorized positive styles.

Pith tools