REVIEW 4 cited by
Uncertainty in Natural Language Processing: Sources, Quantification, and Applications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As a main field of artificial intelligence, natural language processing (NLP) has achieved remarkable success via deep neural networks. Plenty of NLP tasks have been addressed in a unified manner, with various tasks being associated with each other through sharing the same paradigm. However, neural networks are black boxes and rely on probability computation. Making mistakes is inevitable. Therefore, estimating the reliability and trustworthiness (in other words, uncertainty) of neural networks becomes a key research direction, which plays a crucial role in reducing models' risks and making better decisions. Therefore, in this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of uncertainty-relevant works in the NLP field. Considering the data and paradigms characteristics, we first categorize the sources of uncertainty in natural language into three types, including input, system, and output. Then, we systemically review uncertainty quantification approaches and the main applications. Finally, we discuss the challenges of uncertainty estimation in NLP and discuss potential future directions, taking into account recent trends in the field. Though there have been a few surveys about uncertainty estimation, our work is the first to review uncertainty from the NLP perspective.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Is Your Model Fairly Certain? Uncertainty-Aware Fairness Evaluation for LLMs
UCerF scores LLM fairness by both correctness and confidence, and SynthBias provides 31,756 gender-occupation coreference samples for benchmark testing.
-
Bridging Distribution Shift and AI Safety: Conceptual and Methodological Synergies
The paper proposes a one-to-one mapping between six causes of distribution shift and several AI safety issues, arguing for mutual method transfer through aligned definitions.
-
Soft Thinking: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of LLMs in Continuous Concept Space
A training-free method that feeds probability-weighted token embeddings back into LLMs during reasoning, improving accuracy and token efficiency on math and coding tasks.
-
Challenges in Understanding Modality Conflict in Vision-Language Models
In LLaVA-OV-7B, a linearly decodable conflict signal appears in intermediate layers and detection-related attention shifts precede resolution-related ones, supporting a detection/resolution separation in the model.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.