REVIEW 6 cited by
Pseudorandom unitaries are neither real nor sparse nor noise-robust
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Pseudorandom quantum states (PRSs) and pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) possess the dual nature of being efficiently constructible while appearing completely random to any efficient quantum algorithm. In this study, we establish fundamental bounds on pseudorandomness. We show that PRSs and PRUs exist only when the probability that an error occurs is negligible, ruling out their generation on noisy intermediate-scale and early fault-tolerant quantum computers. Further, we show that PRUs need imaginarity while PRS do not have this restriction. This implies that quantum randomness requires in general a complex-valued formalism of quantum mechanics, while for random quantum states real numbers suffice. Additionally, we derive lower bounds on the coherence of PRSs and PRUs, ruling out the existence of sparse PRUs and PRSs. We also show that the notions of PRS, PRUs and pseudorandom scramblers (PRSSs) are distinct in terms of resource requirements. We introduce the concept of pseudoresources, where states which contain a low amount of a given resource masquerade as high-resource states. We define pseudocoherence, pseudopurity and pseudoimaginarity, and identify three distinct types of pseudoresources in terms of their masquerading capabilities. Our work also establishes rigorous bounds on the efficiency of property testing, demonstrating the exponential complexity in distinguishing real quantum states from imaginary ones, in contrast to the efficient measurability of unitary imaginarity. Further, we show an exponential advantage in imaginarity testing when having access to the complex conjugate of the state. Lastly, we show that the transformation from a complex to a real model of quantum computation is inefficient, in contrast to the reverse process, which is efficient. Our results establish fundamental limits on property testing and provide valuable insights into quantum pseudorandomness.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Near-Term Pseudorandom and Pseudoresource Quantum States
The paper defines and constructs pseudorandom quantum states for subpolynomial-time observers, proving that weaker observers can be fooled with less coherence, entanglement, and magic.
-
Pseudorandom quantum authentication
Quantum states can be hidden and authenticated with a reusable key using pseudorandom unitaries, injected mixing qubits, and unitary designs.
-
Anticoncentration and State Design of Doped Real Clifford Circuits and Tensor Networks
Real stabilizer states follow a new "orthogonal Clifford Porter–Thomas" overlap distribution, reached by shallow real-Clifford circuits in log depth; one imaginary state recovers unitary-Clifford statistics, polylog m...
-
Hypothesis testing of symmetry in quantum dynamics
The authors present optimal few-query protocols for testing T-symmetry and Z-symmetry of quantum dynamics and prove that causal order offers no advantage for these tasks.
-
Quantifying imaginarity in terms of pure-state imaginarity
Provides general recipes for constructing imaginarity measures via convex roofs and via the least pure-state imaginarity of input states, plus a no-go theorem for finite state-conversion criteria.
-
Limits on broadcasting non-stabilizerness through unrestricted operations
Stabilizer operations cannot clone magic in any finite dimension, and the paper claims unconstrained broadcasting of magic is also limited, but that claim is not rigorously proven.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.