REVIEW 3 cited by
Large Language Models Enable Few-Shot Clustering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Unlike traditional unsupervised clustering, semi-supervised clustering allows users to provide meaningful structure to the data, which helps the clustering algorithm to match the user's intent. Existing approaches to semi-supervised clustering require a significant amount of feedback from an expert to improve the clusters. In this paper, we ask whether a large language model can amplify an expert's guidance to enable query-efficient, few-shot semi-supervised text clustering. We show that LLMs are surprisingly effective at improving clustering. We explore three stages where LLMs can be incorporated into clustering: before clustering (improving input features), during clustering (by providing constraints to the clusterer), and after clustering (using LLMs post-correction). We find incorporating LLMs in the first two stages can routinely provide significant improvements in cluster quality, and that LLMs enable a user to make trade-offs between cost and accuracy to produce desired clusters. We release our code and LLM prompts for the public to use.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
TaxoAdapt: Aligning LLM-Based Multidimensional Taxonomy Construction to Evolving Research Corpora
TaxoAdapt aligns LLM-generated taxonomies to a corpus by classifying papers along task, method, dataset, evaluation, and domain dimensions, then expanding the tree based on paper density.
-
Information-Theoretic Generative Clustering of Documents
A clustering method that replaces document embeddings with language-model probabilities over generated texts achieves state-of-the-art results on four document datasets.
-
MIMDE: Exploring the Use of Synthetic vs Human Data for Evaluating Multi-Insight Multi-Document Extraction Tasks
LLMs rank similarly on human and synthetic data for extracting insights, but synthetic data does not predict how well models map insights back to source documents.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.