REVIEW 2 cited by
Robust Hate Speech Detection in Social Media: A Cross-Dataset Empirical Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The automatic detection of hate speech online is an active research area in NLP. Most of the studies to date are based on social media datasets that contribute to the creation of hate speech detection models trained on them. However, data creation processes contain their own biases, and models inherently learn from these dataset-specific biases. In this paper, we perform a large-scale cross-dataset comparison where we fine-tune language models on different hate speech detection datasets. This analysis shows how some datasets are more generalisable than others when used as training data. Crucially, our experiments show how combining hate speech detection datasets can contribute to the development of robust hate speech detection models. This robustness holds even when controlling by data size and compared with the best individual datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
HateBench: Benchmarking Hate Speech Detectors on LLM-Generated Content and Hate Campaigns
HateBench shows current hate speech detectors miss a meaningful share of LLM-generated hate and are evaded by word-level edits, enabling automated hate campaigns.
-
How Effectively Can BERT Models Interpret Context and Detect Bengali Communal Violent Text?
Fine-tuned BanglaBERT and an ensemble of BERT variants achieve macro F1 scores of 0.60 and 0.63 for detecting Bengali communal violent text on a newly augmented dataset.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.