Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

BLEURT Has Universal Translations: An Analysis of Automatic Metrics by Minimum Risk Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.03131 v2 pith:QCX3G6P6 submitted 2023-07-06 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords metricstrainingautomaticmachinerobustnesstranslationanalysisbiases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatic metrics play a crucial role in machine translation. Despite the widespread use of n-gram-based metrics, there has been a recent surge in the development of pre-trained model-based metrics that focus on measuring sentence semantics. However, these neural metrics, while achieving higher correlations with human evaluations, are often considered to be black boxes with potential biases that are difficult to detect. In this study, we systematically analyze and compare various mainstream and cutting-edge automatic metrics from the perspective of their guidance for training machine translation systems. Through Minimum Risk Training (MRT), we find that certain metrics exhibit robustness defects, such as the presence of universal adversarial translations in BLEURT and BARTScore. In-depth analysis suggests two main causes of these robustness deficits: distribution biases in the training datasets, and the tendency of the metric paradigm. By incorporating token-level constraints, we enhance the robustness of evaluation metrics, which in turn leads to an improvement in the performance of machine translation systems. Codes are available at \url{https://github.com/powerpuffpomelo/fairseq_mrt}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Geometric Metrics and LLMs: What They Measure and When They Work

    cs.CL 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper's abstract claims that Schatten Norm and MOM reflect output length and that geometric features add modest classifier accuracy over text statistics, but the body instead reports consistent generator rankings ...

Pith tools