Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Fairness and Diversity in Recommender Systems: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.04644 v2 pith:4PODFRMH submitted 2023-07-10 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords diversityfairnessrecommendersurveysystemsconnectionsdomainsitem-level
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recommender systems are effective tools for mitigating information overload and have seen extensive applications across various domains. However, the single focus on utility goals proves to be inadequate in addressing real-world concerns, leading to increasing attention to fairness-aware and diversity-aware recommender systems. While most existing studies explore fairness and diversity independently, we identify strong connections between these two domains. In this survey, we first discuss each of them individually and then dive into their connections. Additionally, motivated by the concepts of user-level and item-level fairness, we broaden the understanding of diversity to encompass not only the item level but also the user level. With this expanded perspective on user and item-level diversity, we re-interpret fairness studies from the viewpoint of diversity. This fresh perspective enhances our understanding of fairness-related work and paves the way for potential future research directions. Papers discussed in this survey along with public code links are available at https://github.com/YuyingZhao/Awesome-Fairness-and-Diversity-Papers-in-Recommender-Systems .

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GORACS: Group-level Optimal Transport-guided Coreset Selection for LLM-based Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GORACS selects small groups of fine-tuning examples via an optimal-transport and gradient-norm proxy objective, outperforming prior coreset methods for LLM-based recommendation.

  2. Why Multi-Interest Fairness Matters: Hypergraph Contrastive Multi-Interest Learning for Fair Conversational Recommender System

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    HyFairCRS uses hypergraph-plus-line-graph contrastive learning to capture multiple user interests and reports improved accuracy and popularity fairness on four conversational recommendation datasets.

Pith tools