Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

GPT4 is Slightly Helpful for Peer-Review Assistance: A Pilot Study

As of 15 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 10 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2307.05492.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2307.05492 v1

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 10 of 10 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00

measured 10 of 10 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-11T19:57:43.513263Z

measured 1 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

14
arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation 9fb9b98d-813e-41c0-9e74-52d25c7b5e43 · inbound

Generative Adversarial Reviews: When LLMs Become the Critic cites this paper.

Generative Adversarial Reviews: When LLMs Become the Critic GPT4 is Slightly Helpful for Peer-Review Assistance: A Pilot Study

Reference 20

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-11T19:57:43.513263Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-11T19:57:43.513263Z digest=sha256:4d6baba63146bc14e00c7b121cbc63e912364ed186bc777843a3372ad917d661

Observation 0d001435-b178-4f42-9463-ba927a3222d7 · inbound

LLM4SR: A Survey on Large Language Models for Scientific Research cites this paper.

LLM4SR: A Survey on Large Language Models for Scientific Research GPT4 is Slightly Helpful for Peer-Review Assistance: A Pilot Study

Reference 129

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-10T21:39:25.621731Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-10T21:39:25.621731Z digest=sha256:cf9d7356d64de7009318ae59a261ba286a5a49027b507cd043627194205682c6

Observation 88ee51ef-9bf7-40b4-adbb-be8ed491cf47 · inbound

Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey cites this paper.

Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey GPT4 is Slightly Helpful for Peer-Review Assistance: A Pilot Study

Reference 75

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-10T19:16:12.918300Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-10T19:16:12.918300Z digest=sha256:434f1f75d76949c712ee1a052d443336867fdb9ee6f251d362882effd71681e9

Observation 40f1571d-8121-4d95-8fff-753dede73594 · inbound

SC4ANM: Identifying Optimal Section Combinations for Automated Novelty Prediction in Academic Papers cites this paper.

SC4ANM: Identifying Optimal Section Combinations for Automated Novelty Prediction in Academic Papers GPT4 is Slightly Helpful for Peer-Review Assistance: A Pilot Study

Reference 31

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:05:27.180000Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T15:05:27.180000Z digest=sha256:cd6505db8fdfa34aa0d9b700410a12f63af03e3b0fea5c10a2eb9458db09e048

Observation 5367ad39-3a78-4107-a265-099e50aa9b0b · inbound

Automated Novelty Evaluation of Academic Paper: A Collaborative Approach Integrating Human and Large Language Model Knowledge cites this paper.

Automated Novelty Evaluation of Academic Paper: A Collaborative Approach Integrating Human and Large Language Model Knowledge GPT4 is Slightly Helpful for Peer-Review Assistance: A Pilot Study

Reference 49

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:15:44.917348Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-06T17:15:44.917348Z digest=sha256:81e28a0279cf9c886f89f6846d2681e46cad9c5d416ae8323c6892ae3f0df6e6

Observation 94305aef-26af-4bf6-b18c-84e5f3fe1961 · inbound

Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI cites this paper.

Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI GPT4 is Slightly Helpful for Peer-Review Assistance: A Pilot Study

Reference 35

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T13:21:18.994734Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-10T01:50:31.124812Z digest=sha256:2d9d349f8b338bd8c1bba5c558bf19830d2a7a379843bc3856876a0e709f06a2

Observation ed8117ac-49a1-4825-836f-98dcbf5c0a1a · inbound

When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee? cites this paper.

When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee? GPT4 is Slightly Helpful for Peer-Review Assistance: A Pilot Study

Reference 147

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-08T23:19:30.564789Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-08T06:19:54.727724Z digest=sha256:f3e10bfc3255310d8abb7f9d21731d0e3a43eaa64ecf591c5edddcc68a4bc588

Observation bdfe83de-877c-46b8-83ce-738376a5d80d · inbound

Can AI Review Improve Paper Drafting? An Empirical Study on 20 Computer Architecture Submissions cites this paper.

Can AI Review Improve Paper Drafting? An Empirical Study on 20 Computer Architecture Submissions GPT4 is Slightly Helpful for Peer-Review Assistance: A Pilot Study

Reference 23

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-01T21:06:14.511477Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-28T17:27:59.500885Z digest=sha256:e1f5fd8c21d8bf65052a89d11284efbbc4ef0400a62837b59a788e9121dd494c

Observation b85dcf9e-fc04-4a37-9bf6-ba0559097e25 · inbound

From Passive Generation to Investigation: A Proactive Scientific Peer Review Agent cites this paper.

From Passive Generation to Investigation: A Proactive Scientific Peer Review Agent GPT4 is Slightly Helpful for Peer-Review Assistance: A Pilot Study

Reference 7

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-06-27T07:20:42.027403Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-06-27T07:14:53.780036Z digest=sha256:2127cea95c77cfb4814eb31950faf43e73383e32362404360356ce0af67bd631

Observation f52bfdf8-dd43-433d-b194-944632872b9d · inbound

LLM-Based Scientific Peer Review: Methods, Benchmarks, and Reliability Challenges cites this paper.

LLM-Based Scientific Peer Review: Methods, Benchmarks, and Reliability Challenges GPT4 is Slightly Helpful for Peer-Review Assistance: A Pilot Study

Reference 50

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-04T17:30:00.412246Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-25T23:39:34.179789Z digest=sha256:b446edc158f1fb1e9218ca7efeb85eebc7ed6ce2324a7ab44e877724adb9a0bb