Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Random-Set Neural Networks (RS-NN)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.05772 v5 pith:74OZS2BY submitted 2023-07-11 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords rs-nnlearningsetsapproachbeliefknowneuralpredictions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning is increasingly deployed in safety-critical domains where erroneous predictions may lead to potentially catastrophic consequences, highlighting the need for learning systems to be aware of how confident they are in their own predictions: in other words, 'to know when they do not know'. In this paper, we propose a novel Random-Set Neural Network (RS-NN) approach to classification which predicts belief functions (rather than classical probability vectors) over the class list using the mathematics of random sets, i.e., distributions over the collection of sets of classes. RS-NN encodes the 'epistemic' uncertainty induced by training sets that are insufficiently representative or limited in size via the size of the convex set of probability vectors associated with a predicted belief function. Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art Bayesian and Ensemble methods in terms of accuracy, uncertainty estimation and out-of-distribution (OoD) detection on multiple benchmarks (CIFAR-10 vs SVHN/Intel-Image, MNIST vs FMNIST/KMNIST, ImageNet vs ImageNet-O). RS-NN also scales up effectively to large-scale architectures (e.g. WideResNet-28-10, VGG16, Inception V3, EfficientNetB2 and ViT-Base-16), exhibits remarkable robustness to adversarial attacks and can provide statistical guarantees in a conformal learning setting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Epistemic Wrapping for Uncertainty Quantification

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Bayesian weight posterior is wrapped into a belief-function posterior via interval masses and a fitted Dirichlet distribution, then used to initialize a Hybrid Interval Neural Network, with reported accuracy and OOD...

  2. Random-Set Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Random-Set LLMs predict belief functions over token clusters and report higher QA accuracy and credal-width uncertainty signals.

Pith tools