Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Dataset Distillation Meets Provable Subset Selection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.08086 v1 pith:6HRYT555 submitted 2023-07-16 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords datasetdistillationlosstrainingdatafunctiondistilledimportant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Deep learning has grown tremendously over recent years, yielding state-of-the-art results in various fields. However, training such models requires huge amounts of data, increasing the computational time and cost. To address this, dataset distillation was proposed to compress a large training dataset into a smaller synthetic one that retains its performance -- this is usually done by (1) uniformly initializing a synthetic set and (2) iteratively updating/learning this set according to a predefined loss by uniformly sampling instances from the full data. In this paper, we improve both phases of dataset distillation: (1) we present a provable, sampling-based approach for initializing the distilled set by identifying important and removing redundant points in the data, and (2) we further merge the idea of data subset selection with dataset distillation, by training the distilled set on ``important'' sampled points during the training procedure instead of randomly sampling the next batch. To do so, we define the notion of importance based on the relative contribution of instances with respect to two different loss functions, i.e., one for the initialization phase (a kernel fitting function for kernel ridge regression and $K$-means based loss function for any other distillation method), and the relative cross-entropy loss (or any other predefined loss) function for the training phase. Finally, we provide experimental results showing how our method can latch on to existing dataset distillation techniques and improve their performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. \emph{FoQuS}: A Forgetting-Quality Coreset Selection Framework for Automatic Modulation Recognition

    cs.LG 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    FoQuS uses three training-dynamics scores to select a 1% to 30% coreset for AMR and claims higher accuracy than ten existing coreset methods.

  2. The Evolution of Dataset Distillation: Toward Scalable and Generalizable Solutions

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A 2023-2025 survey of dataset distillation that organizes matching, generative, decoupling, and selective methods and tabulates ImageNet-scale accuracy comparisons.

Pith tools