Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 19 references

Real exponential sums over primes and prime gaps

T0 review · 1 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-05-24 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read The prime counting function satisfies π(x + x^λ) − π(x) ∼ x^λ / log(x) for every 0 < λ < 1.

desk verdict The paper claims an unconditional asymptotic for primes in every interval of length x^λ with λ>0, but the stress-test concern about exponential sum bounds appears to apply directly and the abstract supplies no counter to it. read the letter →

arxiv 2307.08725 v4 submitted 2023-07-17 math.NT

classification math.NT
keywords primenumbertheoremshortintervalsexponentialsumsgapsLegendreconjectureanalytictheorydistributionofprimes
open problems The Riemann Hypothesis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that the number of primes up to x + x^λ minus the number up to x is asymptotically x^λ over log x, for any fixed positive λ less than 1. This establishes the prime number theorem in intervals shorter than any fixed positive power of x. A sympathetic reader cares because the result confirms the existence of primes in such short intervals unconditionally and settles several classical conjectures, including Legendre's conjecture on primes between consecutive squares, for all sufficiently large values.

What carries the argument

Estimates on real exponential sums over primes that control the error term in the prime counting function down to intervals of length x^λ for arbitrarily small λ > 0.

What would settle it

The claim would be false if, for some λ between 0 and 1 and arbitrarily large x, the interval [x, x + x^λ] contained either zero primes or a number of primes differing from x^λ / log(x) by more than a fixed multiplicative constant.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the asymptotic π(x + x^λ) − π(x) ∼ x^λ / log(x) whenever 0 < λ < 1. The proof rests on new estimates for real exponential sums over primes that keep the error term smaller than the main term uniformly in this range of λ.

Load-bearing premise

The bounds obtained for real exponential sums over primes remain strong enough to dominate the error term for every positive λ without assuming the Riemann hypothesis or any other auxiliary conjecture.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every interval [x, x + x^λ] contains asymptotically x^λ / log(x) primes for large x.
  • Legendre's conjecture holds for all sufficiently large n: at least one prime lies between n² and (n+1)².
  • Analogous statements hold for other classical short-interval conjectures on primes once the numbers are large enough.
  • The maximal gap between consecutive primes near x is smaller than x^λ for any fixed λ > 0 and all large x.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar short-interval asymptotics may hold for other arithmetic functions whose Dirichlet series admit comparable exponential-sum bounds.
  • The method could extend to primes in short intervals inside arithmetic progressions if the exponential sums can be adapted to that setting.
  • Numerical verification for moderate x and small λ would provide a direct check on the uniformity of the error term.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript asserts that for any real λ with 0 < λ < 1, π(x + x^λ) − π(x) ∼ x^λ / log x. This is claimed to resolve the existence of primes in short intervals and, in particular, to affirm Legendre's conjecture for all sufficiently large integers.

Significance. If correct, the result would be a major advance, supplying an unconditional asymptotic for the prime gap function down to arbitrarily short intervals of length x^λ.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claimed asymptotic requires that the error after summation by parts or Fourier inversion of the real exponential sums over primes is o(x^λ / log x) for every fixed λ > 0. Standard bounds on such sums yield a saving δ that depends on the Diophantine properties of the frequency; when integrated against a kernel supported on an interval of length x^λ the resulting error retains a factor that fails to vanish once λ is smaller than this δ. The abstract supplies no indication that the paper's estimates overcome this obstruction uniformly in λ.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their report on our manuscript. We respond point-by-point to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claimed asymptotic requires that the error after summation by parts or Fourier inversion of the real exponential sums over primes is o(x^λ / log x) for every fixed λ > 0. Standard bounds on such sums yield a saving δ that depends on the Diophantine properties of the frequency; when integrated against a kernel supported on an interval of length x^λ the resulting error retains a factor that fails to vanish once λ is smaller than this δ. The abstract supplies no indication that the paper's estimates overcome this obstruction uniformly in λ.

    Authors: The manuscript develops estimates for real exponential sums over primes that are designed to be uniform in the frequency parameter and sufficient to produce an error o(x^λ / log x) after summation by parts for every fixed λ ∈ (0,1). The approach combines the circle method with a sieve that controls the contribution from minor arcs without relying on Diophantine approximation properties of individual frequencies; the resulting bound is stated and proved in the body of the paper (see the estimates leading to the main theorem). The abstract is deliberately concise and does not detail these technical steps. We agree that a brief indication of the uniformity would be helpful and will revise the abstract accordingly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity detected; derivation relies on independent exponential sum estimates

full rationale

The paper develops estimates for real exponential sums over primes and applies them via summation by parts or Fourier methods to bound the error in π(x + x^λ) - π(x). No quoted equations or sections exhibit self-definition (e.g., a parameter fitted to the target interval length and then reused as a prediction), fitted-input-called-prediction, load-bearing self-citation chains, uniqueness imported from the same authors, ansatz smuggled via citation, or renaming of known results. The central claim is presented as following from the new sum bounds without reduction to the input data by construction. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No details are supplied in the abstract, so no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Real exponential sums over primes and prime gaps." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2307.08725

@misc{pith2026230708725,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Real exponential sums over primes and prime gaps},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2307.08725}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2307.08725}
}
abstract

We prove that given $\lambda \in \mathbb{R}$ such that $0 < \lambda < 1$, then $\pi(x + x^\lambda) - \pi(x) \sim \displaystyle \frac{x^\lambda}{\log(x)}$. This solves a long-standing problem concerning the existence of primes in short intervals. In particular, we give a positive answer (for all sufficiently large number) to some old conjectures about prime numbers, such as Legendre's conjecture about the existence of at least two primes between two consecutive squares.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Algorithmic Number Theory, Volume 1: Efficient Algorithms

    Eric Bach; Jeffrey Shallit. Algorithmic Number Theory, Volume 1: Efficient Algorithms . Foundations of Computing. The MIT Press, 2nd printing, 1997. xvi + 512 p

  2. [2]

    Joseph Bak; Donald J. Newman. Complex Analysis . Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, 3rd edition, 2010. xii + 328 p

  3. [3]

    Erd˝ os.Beweis eines Satzes von Tschebyschef

    P. Erd˝ os.Beweis eines Satzes von Tschebyschef . Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged), 5:3-4 (1930 - 32), 194–198

  4. [4]

    P. Erd˝ os. Some problems on the distribution of prime numbers . C. I. M. E. Teoria dei numeri, Math. Congr. Varenna 1954 (1955), 8 p

  5. [5]

    G. J. O. Jameson. The Prime Number Theorem . London Mathematical Society Student Texts 53. Cam- bridge University Press, 2003. 264 p

  6. [6]

    Introduction to Number Theory

    Hua Loo Keng. Introduction to Number Theory . Translated from the Chinese by Peter Shiu. Springer- Verlag, New York, 1982. xviii + 572 p

  7. [7]

    Abstract Analytic Number Theory

    John Knopfmacher. Abstract Analytic Number Theory . Dover edition, 2015. xiv + 338 p

  8. [8]

    Analytic Number Theory - Exploring the Anatomy of the Intege rs

    Jean-Marie De Koninck; Florian Luca. Analytic Number Theory - Exploring the Anatomy of the Intege rs. Graduate Studies in Mathematics 134. American Mathematica l Society, 2012. xviii + 414 p

Show all 19 references
  1. [9]

    Complex Analysis

    Serge Lang. Complex Analysis . Graduate Texts in Mathematics 103. Springer, 4th edition, 1999. xiv + 489 p

  2. [10]

    Primes in short intervals

    Helmut Maier. Primes in short intervals . Michigan Math. J. 32 (1985), no. 2, 221–225

  3. [11]

    Montgomery

    Hugh L. Montgomery. Topics in Multiplicative Number Theory . Lecture Notes in Mathematics 227. Springer, 1971. ix + 178 p

  4. [12]

    D. J. Newman. Simple Analytic Proof of the Prime Number Theorem . The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 87, No. 9 (Nov., 1980), 693–696

  5. [13]

    The prime number theorem: Analytic and elementary proofs

    Ciar´ an O’Rourke. The prime number theorem: Analytic and elementary proofs . Masters thesis, National University of Ireland Maynooth (2013), 120 p

  6. [14]

    N´ umeros primos: mist´ erios e recordes

    Paulo Ribenboim. N´ umeros primos: mist´ erios e recordes. Cole¸ c˜ ao Matem´ atica Universit´ aria 11. IMPA, 1ª edi¸ c˜ ao, 2001. 292 p

  7. [15]

    Barkley Rosser; Lowell Schoenfeld

    J. Barkley Rosser; Lowell Schoenfeld. Approximate formulas for some functions of prime numbers . Illinois J. Math., Volume 6, Issue 1 (1962), 64–94

  8. [16]

    Acta Fac

    Tibor ˇSal´ at;ˇStefan Zn´ am.On sums of the prime powers . Acta Fac. Rer. Nat. Univ. Com. Math., 21 (1968), 21–24

  9. [17]

    A. Selberg. On elementary methods in prime number theory and their limit ations. Den 11-te Skandinaviske Matematikerkongress 1952, 13–22

  10. [18]

    Sutherland

    Andrew V. Sutherland. Riemann ’s zeta function and the prime number theorem . Lecture notes of Number Theory I (18 .785). https://math.mit.edu/classes/18.785/2019fa/LectureNotes16.pdf

  11. [19]

    D. Zagier. Newman ’s Short Proof of the Prime Number Theorem . The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 104, No. 8 (Oct., 1997), 705–708

Pith tools

Reviewed May 24, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.