REVIEW 2 cited by
Finding Universal Relations using Statistical Data Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We present applications of statistical data analysis methods from both bi- and multivariate statistics to find suitable sets of neutron star features that can be leveraged for accurate and EoS independent -- or universal -- relations. To this end, we investigate the ability of various correlation measures such as Distance Correlation and Mutual Information in identifying universally related pairs of neutron star features. We also evaluate relations produced by methods of multivariate statistics such as Principal Component Analysis to assess their suitability for producing universal relations with multiple independent variables. As part of our analyses, we also put forward multiple entirely novel relations, including a multivariate relation for the $f$-mode frequency of neutron stars with a reduced average relative error of $0.010$, compared to an error of $0.015$ of existing, bivariate relations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Combining simulation-based inference and universal relations for precise and accurate neutron star science
A machine-learning simulator trained on 1,491 simulated equations of state discovers a neutron-star radius relation R(M,f,p1), predicting radii to tens of meters with calibrated error bars.
-
Universal description of the Neutron Star's surface and its key global properties: A Machine Learning Approach for nonrotating and rapidly rotating stellar models
The authors introduce new equation-of-state-insensitive fits and neural-network models for the radius, logarithmic derivative, and effective gravity on rotating neutron star surfaces, with claimed sub-percent test accuracy.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.