REVIEW 7 cited by
Do LLMs Possess a Personality? Making the MBTI Test an Amazing Evaluation for Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The field of large language models (LLMs) has made significant progress, and their knowledge storage capacity is approaching that of human beings. Furthermore, advanced techniques, such as prompt learning and reinforcement learning, are being employed to address ethical concerns and hallucination problems associated with LLMs, bringing them closer to aligning with human values. This situation naturally raises the question of whether LLMs with human-like abilities possess a human-like personality? In this paper, we aim to investigate the feasibility of using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), a widespread human personality assessment tool, as an evaluation metric for LLMs. Specifically, extensive experiments will be conducted to explore: 1) the personality types of different LLMs, 2) the possibility of changing the personality types by prompt engineering, and 3) How does the training dataset affect the model's personality. Although the MBTI is not a rigorous assessment, it can still reflect the similarity between LLMs and human personality. In practice, the MBTI has the potential to serve as a rough indicator. Our codes are available at https://github.com/HarderThenHarder/transformers_tasks/tree/main/LLM/llms_mbti.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
From Representations to Behaviors: Exploring the Person-Situation-Behavior Triad in LLMs
SAE features recovered from matched high–low trait behaviors can be steered to bidirectionally shift situational personality expression and produce human-like social benefit–cost patterns in an 8B LLM.
-
When Does Personality Composition Matter for Multi-Agent LLM Teams?
Low agreeableness massively shifts multi-agent LLM communication yet barely hurts coding milestones, while the same prompt sharply degrades research milestones and collapses bargaining agreements.
-
Value Drifts: Tracing Value Alignment During LLM Post-Training
Value alignment in LLMs is set largely during supervised fine-tuning; standard preference-optimization datasets carry too little stance contrast to re-align it, but with engineered contrast algorithms differ (DPO ampl...
-
Towards Understanding the Cognitive Habits of Large Reasoning Models
A new benchmark shows large reasoning models exhibit human-like cognitive habits in their chain-of-thought, and some habits correlate with unsafe responses.
-
Effects of Personality- and Opinion-Alignment in Human-AI Interaction
People rate AI chatbots as more trustworthy, competent, warm, and persuasive when the chatbots share their opinion, whereas matching the chatbot's personality to the user's has little or no effect.
-
From Post To Personality: Harnessing LLMs for MBTI Prediction in Social Media
A two-stage LLM pipeline with retrieval-augmented prompting and synthetic minority oversampling claims state-of-the-art MBTI classification on PersonalityCafe, though its AUC uses neighbor-label distribution, not mode...
-
Psychologically Enhanced AI Agents
MBTI personality prompts measurably change how LLM agents write stories and play strategic games, with self-reflection before communication supporting cooperative behavior.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.