Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Test Case Minimization with Quantum Annealers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.05505 v1 pith:CSH2SB6R submitted 2023-08-10 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords quantumbootqaannealersdecompositionoptimizationproblemproblemssolving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum annealers are specialized quantum computers for solving combinatorial optimization problems using special characteristics of quantum computing (QC), such as superposition, entanglement, and quantum tunneling. Theoretically, quantum annealers can outperform classical computers. However, the currently available quantum annealers are small-scale, i.e., they have limited quantum bits (qubits); hence, they currently cannot demonstrate the quantum advantage. Nonetheless, research is warranted to develop novel mechanisms to formulate combinatorial optimization problems for quantum annealing (QA). However, solving combinatorial problems with QA in software engineering remains unexplored. Toward this end, we propose BootQA, the very first effort at solving the test case minimization (TCM) problem with QA. In BootQA, we provide a novel formulation of TCM for QA, followed by devising a mechanism to incorporate bootstrap sampling to QA to optimize the use of qubits. We also implemented our TCM formulation in three other optimization processes: classical simulated annealing (SA), QA without problem decomposition, and QA with an existing D-Wave problem decomposition strategy, and conducted an empirical evaluation with three real-world TCM datasets. Results show that BootQA outperforms QA without problem decomposition and QA with the existing decomposition strategy in terms of effectiveness. Moreover, BootQA's effectiveness is similar to SA. Finally, BootQA has higher efficiency in terms of time when solving large TCM problems than the other three optimization processes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Preliminary Investigation on the Usage of Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithms for Test Case Selection

    quant-ph 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    QAOA-TCS, a QAOA-based test case selection method with K-Means clustering, finds more Pareto-optimal solutions than classical and annealing baselines on four SIR programs in ideal simulation.

  2. Reformulating Regression Test Suite Optimization using Quantum Annealing -- an Empirical Study

    cs.SE 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SelectQA, a QUBO-based quantum annealing approach, matches classical regression test selection on some programs, but its advantage over BootQA is weakened by an unfair problem formulation.

  3. Using quantum annealing to generate test cases for cyber-physical systems

    cs.ET 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Quantum annealing, applied to QUBO-encoded test-case mutation selection, matches classical heuristics in fault detection but runs in less wall-clock time on two Simulink CPS case studies.

Pith tools