Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.06767 v2 pith:2O6JIZGG submitted 2023-08-13 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords pruningmodelsneuralresearchdeeplargenetworkanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modern deep neural networks, particularly recent large language models, come with massive model sizes that require significant computational and storage resources. To enable the deployment of modern models on resource-constrained environments and accelerate inference time, researchers have increasingly explored pruning techniques as a popular research direction in neural network compression. However, there is a dearth of up-to-date comprehensive review papers on pruning. To address this issue, in this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of existing research works on deep neural network pruning in a taxonomy of 1) universal/specific speedup, 2) when to prune, 3) how to prune, and 4) fusion of pruning and other compression techniques. We then provide a thorough comparative analysis of eight pairs of contrast settings for pruning and explore emerging topics, including pruning for large language models, large multimodal models, post-training pruning, and different supervision levels for pruning to shed light on the commonalities and differences of existing methods and lay the foundation for further method development. To facilitate future research, we build a curated collection of datasets, networks, and evaluations on different applications. Finally, we provide valuable recommendations on selecting pruning methods and prospect several promising research directions. We build a repository at https://github.com/hrcheng1066/awesome-pruning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 23 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. WIDE: Boosting Adaptive LLM Inference via Token-level Dynamic Width Pruning

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Token-wise dynamic width pruning of attention-head and FFN groups, paired with mask-reordering GPU kernels, retains far more accuracy than dynamic depth pruning at 50% sparsity while delivering practical prefill/decod...

  2. Forget the Data and Fine-Tuning! Just Fold the Network to Compress

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Model folding compresses a network by k-means clustering similar neurons across adjacent layers and repairing activation statistics without data (Fold-AR, Fold-DIR), surpassing prior data-free methods at high sparsity.

  3. Grokking vs. Learning: Same Features, Different Encodings

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Grokked and steadily trained models learn the same features, but steady training can produce much more compressible models in a parameter regime that grokking does not reach.

Pith tools