Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Fine-tuning can cripple your foundation model; preserving features may be the solution

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.13320 v3 pith:P62HU4TD submitted 2023-08-25 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords fine-tuningpre-trainedconceptstasksdownstreameffectiveldifsmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Pre-trained foundation models, due to their enormous capacity and exposure to vast amounts of data during pre-training, are known to have learned plenty of real-world concepts. An important step in making these pre-trained models effective on downstream tasks is to fine-tune them on related datasets. While various fine-tuning methods have been devised and have been shown to be highly effective, we observe that a fine-tuned model's ability to recognize concepts on tasks $\textit{different}$ from the downstream one is reduced significantly compared to its pre-trained counterpart. This is an undesirable effect of fine-tuning as a substantial amount of resources was used to learn these pre-trained concepts in the first place. We call this phenomenon ''concept forgetting'' and via experiments show that most end-to-end fine-tuning approaches suffer heavily from this side effect. To this end, we propose a simple fix to this problem by designing a new fine-tuning method called $\textit{LDIFS}$ (short for $\ell_2$ distance in feature space) that, while learning new concepts related to the downstream task, allows a model to preserve its pre-trained knowledge as well. Through extensive experiments on 10 fine-tuning tasks we show that $\textit{LDIFS}$ significantly reduces concept forgetting. Additionally, we show that LDIFS is highly effective in performing continual fine-tuning on a sequence of tasks as well, in comparison with both fine-tuning as well as continual learning baselines.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Piggyback Hypothesis of Generalization: Explaining and Mitigating Emergent Misalignment

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    The Piggyback Hypothesis attributes emergent misalignment to chat-template tokens piggybacking finetuned behavior; Token-Regularized Finetuning (TReFT) mitigates it by regularizing prefix token representations.

  2. LoX: Low-Rank Extrapolation Robustifies LLM Safety Against Fine-tuning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Low-rank extrapolation of an aligned model's weight update (LoX) reduces how much later fine-tuning erodes safety refusal behavior.

  3. Vulnerability-Aware Alignment: Mitigating Uneven Forgetting in Harmful Fine-Tuning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Vulnerability-Aware Alignment splits safety training data into fragile and robust groups, then uses group robust optimization and adversarial perturbations, cutting harmful response rates after harmful fine-tuning by ...

  4. Seeing Clearly, Forgetting Deeply: Revisiting Fine-Tuned Video Generators for Driving Simulation

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning video generators on driving data can improve visual fidelity while degrading how accurately the model predicts the movement of cars and pedestrians.

  5. AsFT: Anchoring Safety During LLM Fine-Tuning Within Narrow Safety Basin

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Penalizing fine-tuning updates that deviate from the aligned-model minus base-model weight direction preserves safety during task fine-tuning.

Pith tools