Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Comparison of Neural Networks for Wireless Channel Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.14020 v1 pith:TUWZYU6Z submitted 2023-08-27 cs.LG cs.NIeess.SP

classification cs.LGcs.NIeess.SP
keywords neuralpredictionchannelnetworksqualityperformancecomparativecomparison
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The performance of modern wireless communications systems depends critically on the quality of the available channel state information (CSI) at the transmitter and receiver. Several previous works have proposed concepts and algorithms that help maintain high quality CSI even in the presence of high mobility and channel aging, such as temporal prediction schemes that employ neural networks. However, it is still unclear which neural network-based scheme provides the best performance in terms of prediction quality, training complexity and practical feasibility. To investigate such a question, this paper first provides an overview of state-of-the-art neural networks applicable to channel prediction and compares their performance in terms of prediction quality. Next, a new comparative analysis is proposed for four promising neural networks with different prediction horizons. The well-known tapped delay channel model recommended by the Third Generation Partnership Program is used for a standardized comparison among the neural networks. Based on this comparative evaluation, the advantages and disadvantages of each neural network are discussed and guidelines for selecting the best-suited neural network in channel prediction applications are given.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CSI-4CAST: A Hybrid Deep Learning Model for CSI Prediction with Comprehensive Robustness and Generalization Testing

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A hybrid CNN-ShuffleNet-Transformer model claims the best accuracy-efficiency trade-off on a new 3,060-scenario CSI prediction benchmark, but FDD gains and robustness claims rest on point estimates without error bars.

Pith tools