Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Science Communications for Explainable Artificial Intelligence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.16377 v1 pith:UX3GWMLK submitted 2023-08-31 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords communicationsartificialbeenintelligencemethodssciencesystemsusers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has a communication problem. XAI methods have been used to make AI more understandable and helped resolve some of the transparency issues that inhibit AI's broader usability. However, user evaluation studies reveal that the often numerical explanations provided by XAI methods have not always been effective for many types of users of AI systems. This article aims to adapt the major communications models from Science Communications into a framework for practitioners to understand, influence, and integrate the context of audiences both for their communications supporting AI literacy in the public and in designing XAI systems that are more adaptive to different users.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. NLP Meets the World: Toward Improving Conversations With the Public About Natural Language Processing Research

    cs.CY 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    NLP researchers should define cognitive terms, temper expectations, and candidly address ethical failures when speaking with the public.

Pith tools