Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the Effects of Heterogeneous Errors on Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.02771 v1 pith:2LEPLJQM submitted 2023-09-06 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords datasourcescorrelatedassumptionsmfbomulti-fidelitynoiseoptimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Bayesian optimization (BO) is a sequential optimization strategy that is increasingly employed in a wide range of areas including materials design. In real world applications, acquiring high-fidelity (HF) data through physical experiments or HF simulations is the major cost component of BO. To alleviate this bottleneck, multi-fidelity (MF) methods are used to forgo the sole reliance on the expensive HF data and reduce the sampling costs by querying inexpensive low-fidelity (LF) sources whose data are correlated with HF samples. However, existing multi-fidelity BO (MFBO) methods operate under the following two assumptions that rarely hold in practical applications: (1) LF sources provide data that are well correlated with the HF data on a global scale, and (2) a single random process can model the noise in the fused data. These assumptions dramatically reduce the performance of MFBO when LF sources are only locally correlated with the HF source or when the noise variance varies across the data sources. In this paper, we dispense with these incorrect assumptions by proposing an MF emulation method that (1) learns a noise model for each data source, and (2) enables MFBO to leverage highly biased LF sources which are only locally correlated with the HF source. We illustrate the performance of our method through analytical examples and engineering problems on materials design.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multi-Fidelity Stochastic Trust Region Method with Adaptive Sampling

    math.OC 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ASTRO-MFDF adaptively selects sample sizes and fidelity levels in a multi-fidelity stochastic trust-region method, showing faster convergence than ASTRO-DF and Nelder-Mead on Rosenbrock and inventory problems.

Pith tools