REVIEW 2 cited by
Bayes' Rays: Uncertainty Quantification for Neural Radiance Fields
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Neural Radiance Fields (NeRFs) have shown promise in applications like view synthesis and depth estimation, but learning from multiview images faces inherent uncertainties. Current methods to quantify them are either heuristic or computationally demanding. We introduce BayesRays, a post-hoc framework to evaluate uncertainty in any pre-trained NeRF without modifying the training process. Our method establishes a volumetric uncertainty field using spatial perturbations and a Bayesian Laplace approximation. We derive our algorithm statistically and show its superior performance in key metrics and applications. Additional results available at: https://bayesrays.github.io.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
GURecon: Learning Detailed 3D Geometric Uncertainties for Neural Surface Reconstruction
GURecon distills multi-view photometric consistency into a continuous 3D geometric uncertainty field for neural surfaces, improving uncertainty estimation and incremental reconstruction.
-
Puzzle Similarity: A Perceptually-guided Cross-Reference Metric for Artifact Detection in 3D Scene Reconstructions
Puzzle Similarity detects artifacts in novel views of 3D scenes by max-pooling feature similarity against training views, and it outperforms prior quality metrics in correlating with human artifact segmentations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.