Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

From Sparse to Dense: GPT-4 Summarization with Chain of Density Prompting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.04269 v1 pith:KCXIZ7IJ submitted 2023-09-08 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords summariesdensegpt-4chaindensitygeneratedpromptsummary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Selecting the ``right'' amount of information to include in a summary is a difficult task. A good summary should be detailed and entity-centric without being overly dense and hard to follow. To better understand this tradeoff, we solicit increasingly dense GPT-4 summaries with what we refer to as a ``Chain of Density'' (CoD) prompt. Specifically, GPT-4 generates an initial entity-sparse summary before iteratively incorporating missing salient entities without increasing the length. Summaries generated by CoD are more abstractive, exhibit more fusion, and have less of a lead bias than GPT-4 summaries generated by a vanilla prompt. We conduct a human preference study on 100 CNN DailyMail articles and find that that humans prefer GPT-4 summaries that are more dense than those generated by a vanilla prompt and almost as dense as human written summaries. Qualitative analysis supports the notion that there exists a tradeoff between informativeness and readability. 500 annotated CoD summaries, as well as an extra 5,000 unannotated summaries, are freely available on HuggingFace (https://huggingface.co/datasets/griffin/chain_of_density).

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comparing Learning Paradigms for Egocentric Video Summarization

    cs.CV 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A prompt-engineered GPT-4o (quality score 64.95) outperformed Shotluck Holmes (61.19) and TAC-SUM (58.43) on a 21-video egocentric summary evaluation, though all scores were modest.

Pith tools