Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

On Autonomous Agents in a Cyber Defence Environment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.07388 v1 pith:INVQQEMX submitted 2023-09-14 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords agentcyberautonomouschallengealgorithmscagedefencedefensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Autonomous Cyber Defence is required to respond to high-tempo cyber-attacks. To facilitate the research in this challenging area, we explore the utility of the autonomous cyber operation environments presented as part of the Cyber Autonomy Gym for Experimentation (CAGE) Challenges, with a specific focus on CAGE Challenge 2. CAGE Challenge 2 required a defensive Blue agent to defend a network from an attacking Red agent. We provide a detailed description of the this challenge and describe the approaches taken by challenge participants. From the submitted agents, we identify four classes of algorithms, namely, Single- Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), Hierarchical DRL, Ensembles, and Non-DRL approaches. Of these classes, we found that the hierarchical DRL approach was the most capable of learning an effective cyber defensive strategy. Our analysis of the agent policies identified that different algorithms within the same class produced diverse strategies and that the strategy used by the defensive Blue agent varied depending on the strategy used by the offensive Red agent. We conclude that DRL algorithms are a suitable candidate for autonomous cyber defence applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Rewards in Reinforcement Learning for Cyber Defence

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sparse, goal-aligned rewards outperform dense engineered rewards for training cyber-defence RL agents, but the advantage depends on the evaluation metric and is not uniformly confirmed in the more complex CAGE environment.

  2. Interpreting Agent Behaviors in Reinforcement-Learning-Based Cyber-Battle Simulation Platforms

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    By tracking per-host ground-truth states, the authors measure how often each CAGE Challenge 2 action actually changes a host's state, finding that top agents waste many actions and that decoys correlate with fewer suc...

  3. Distilling Knowledge from Large Language Models into Lightweight Reinforcement Learning Agents for Autonomous Cyber Operations

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM cyber-defense policies, obtained by prompt engineering alone, can be behavior-cloned into a 64,910-parameter RL agent that matches a heavily trained PPO baseline in the CybORG simulator.

  4. Strategic Cyber Defense via Reinforcement Learning-Guided Combinatorial Auctions

    cs.GT 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    RL Q-values are used as bids in a learned combinatorial auction that allocates defensive actions in the DARPA CAGE 2 simulation, giving revenue near an oracle and allocations loosely aligned with defender activity.

  5. Learning to Communicate in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Cyber Defence

    cs.MA 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adapting the DIAL communication algorithm to CybORG, the authors report that one-bit messaging between defenders beats a global-state QMix baseline in harder simulated cyber attack scenarios.

  6. General Autonomous Cybersecurity Defense: Learning Robust Policies for Dynamic Topologies and Diverse Attackers

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A graph-neural-network plus optimal-transport agent trained on procedurally generated networks generalizes across topology changes and two attacker types in the CAGE 2 simulation.

  7. Nash Q-Network for Multi-Agent Cybersecurity Simulation

    cs.MA 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A MARL variant that trains agents by aligning their policies with Nash equilibria of a centralized critic's joint Q-values, demonstrated on the CybORG CC2 cyber-defense scenario.

Pith tools