Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Line Graph Neural Networks for Link Weight Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.15728 v2 pith:UJWYXLSC submitted 2023-09-27 cs.SI

classification cs.SI
keywords graphlinkweightpredictionfeatureslinemethodnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In real-world networks, predicting the weight (strength) of links is as crucial as predicting the existence of the links themselves. Previous studies have primarily used shallow graph features for link weight prediction, limiting the prediction performance. In this paper, we propose a new link weight prediction method, namely Line Graph Neural Networks for Link Weight Prediction (LGLWP), which learns deeper graph features through deep learning. In our method, we first extract the enclosing subgraph around a target link and then employ a weighted graph labeling algorithm to label the subgraph nodes. Next, we transform the subgraph into the line graph and apply graph convolutional neural networks to learn the node embeddings in the line graph, which can represent the links in the original subgraph. Finally, the node embeddings are fed into a fully-connected neural network to predict the weight of the target link, treated as a regression problem. Our method directly learns link features, surpassing previous methods that splice node features for link weight prediction. Experimental results on six network datasets of various sizes and types demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AI Generalisation Gap In Comorbid Sleep Disorder Staging

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    EEG sleep-staging models that work on healthy subjects generalize poorly to ischemic stroke patients and attend to physiologically uninformative signal regions.

Pith tools