Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Motif: Intrinsic Motivation from Artificial Intelligence Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.00166 v1 pith:67NJS2H4 submitted 2023-09-29 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords motifintrinsicrewardwithoutchallengingenvironmentgameknowledge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Exploring rich environments and evaluating one's actions without prior knowledge is immensely challenging. In this paper, we propose Motif, a general method to interface such prior knowledge from a Large Language Model (LLM) with an agent. Motif is based on the idea of grounding LLMs for decision-making without requiring them to interact with the environment: it elicits preferences from an LLM over pairs of captions to construct an intrinsic reward, which is then used to train agents with reinforcement learning. We evaluate Motif's performance and behavior on the challenging, open-ended and procedurally-generated NetHack game. Surprisingly, by only learning to maximize its intrinsic reward, Motif achieves a higher game score than an algorithm directly trained to maximize the score itself. When combining Motif's intrinsic reward with the environment reward, our method significantly outperforms existing approaches and makes progress on tasks where no advancements have ever been made without demonstrations. Finally, we show that Motif mostly generates intuitive human-aligned behaviors which can be steered easily through prompt modifications, while scaling well with the LLM size and the amount of information given in the prompt.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Weights or Skills? A Survey of Robot-Learning Techniques: from Action-Predicting Weights to Robots that Write their Own Skills

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A taxonomy of robot learning on a weights-versus-skills axis, with a five-rung self-improvement ladder whose top cell (feedback plus memory plus search) holds only a few recent systems.

  2. Timing the Message: Language-Based Notifications for Time-Critical Assistive Settings

    cs.RO 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Modeling both message delivery duration and human reaction delay in a reinforcement-learning notifier improves simulated task success rates from about 22-28% to 93-97%.

  3. LLM Economist: Large Population Models and Mechanism Design in Multi-Agent Generative Simulacra

    cs.MA 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The LLM Economist framework couples persona-conditioned worker agents with an in-context RL planner to search US-bracket tax schedules, yet its Saez benchmark is derived from the planner's own solution and its headlin...

  4. FOUNDER: Grounding Foundation Models in World Models for Open-Ended Embodied Decision Making

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FOUNDER maps foundation-model embeddings of text or video prompts into world-model goal states and rewards policies by predicted temporal distance to those goals, improving reward-free multi-task offline control.

Pith tools