REVIEW 4 cited by
ReAcTable: Enhancing ReAct for Table Question Answering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Table Question Answering (TQA) presents a substantial challenge at the intersection of natural language processing and data analytics. This task involves answering natural language (NL) questions on top of tabular data, demanding proficiency in logical reasoning, understanding of data semantics, and fundamental analytical capabilities. Due to its significance, a substantial volume of research has been dedicated to exploring a wide range of strategies aimed at tackling this challenge including approaches that leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) through in-context learning or Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting as well as approaches that train and fine-tune custom models. Nonetheless, a conspicuous gap exists in the research landscape, where there is limited exploration of how innovative foundational research, which integrates incremental reasoning with external tools in the context of LLMs, as exemplified by the ReAct paradigm, could potentially bring advantages to the TQA task. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap, by introducing ReAcTable (ReAct for Table Question Answering tasks), a framework inspired by the ReAct paradigm that is carefully enhanced to address the challenges uniquely appearing in TQA tasks such as interpreting complex data semantics, dealing with errors generated by inconsistent data and generating intricate data transformations. ReAcTable relies on external tools such as SQL and Python code executors, to progressively enhance the data by generating intermediate data representations, ultimately transforming it into a more accessible format for answering the questions with greater ease. We demonstrate that ReAcTable achieves remarkable performance even when compared to fine-tuned approaches. In particular, it outperforms the best prior result on the WikiTQ benchmark, achieving an accuracy of 68.0% without requiring training a new model or fine-tuning.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Utilizing Training Data to Improve LLM Reasoning for Tabular Understanding
LRTab retrieves error-avoiding prompt conditions learned from incorrect chain-of-thought traces on training tables to improve LLM tabular reasoning, achieving modest gains on WikiTQ and TabFact.
-
Table-r1: Self-supervised and Reinforcement Learning for Program-based Table Reasoning in Small Language Models
Table-r1 combines a layout-transformation self-supervised task and a mix-paradigm GRPO stage so 7B/8B models outperform other small-model table reasoners and approach GPT-4o-level accuracy.
-
What to Keep and What to Drop: Adaptive Table Filtering Framework
ATF prunes table columns and rows with LLM scoring plus retrieval, cutting cells by about 70% and improving out-of-domain TableQA accuracy, while hurting in-domain QA and fact verification.
-
LLM Inference Enhanced by External Knowledge: A Survey
A survey of methods that enhance LLM inference by integrating external structured knowledge from tables and knowledge graphs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.