Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Compressing LLMs: The Truth is Rarely Pure and Never Simple

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.01382 v2 pith:GV6ZKNES submitted 2023-10-02 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords llmsmethodscompressionllm-kicksparsitycompressedin-contextperplexity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Despite their remarkable achievements, modern Large Language Models (LLMs) face exorbitant computational and memory footprints. Recently, several works have shown significant success in training-free and data-free compression (pruning and quantization) of LLMs that achieve 50 - 60% sparsity and reduce the bit width to 3 or 4 bits per weight, with negligible degradation of perplexity over the uncompressed baseline. As recent research efforts are focused on developing increasingly sophisticated compression methods, our work takes a step back and re-evaluates the effectiveness of existing SoTA compression methods, which rely on a fairly simple and widely questioned metric, perplexity (even for dense LLMs). We introduce Knowledge-Intensive Compressed LLM BenchmarK (LLM-KICK), a collection of carefully curated tasks to redefine the evaluation protocol for compressed LLMs, which have significant alignment with their dense counterparts and perplexity fail to capture subtle change in their true capabilities. LLM-KICK unveils many favorable merits and unfortunate plights of current SoTA compression methods: all pruning methods suffer significant performance degradation, sometimes at trivial sparsity ratios (e.g., 25-30%), and fail for N:M sparsity in knowledge-intensive tasks; current quantization methods are more successful than pruning; yet, pruned LLMs even at $\geq 50$% sparsity are robust in-context retrieval and summarization systems; among others. LLM-KICK is designed to holistically access compressed LLMs' ability for language understanding, reasoning, generation, in-context retrieval, in-context summarization, etc. We hope our study can foster the development of better LLM compression methods. The reproduced codes are available at https://github.com/VITA-Group/llm-kick.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Activation Approximations Can Incur Safety Vulnerabilities Even in Aligned LLMs: Comprehensive Analysis and Defense

    cs.CR 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Activation approximations used for faster LLM inference can dramatically increase jailbreak success rates on aligned models, and the paper's QuadA training method restores robust refusal.

  2. Reliability Scaling Laws for Quantized Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Reliability of quantized LLMs peaks nonlinearly at 4-bit precision under fixed total model bits, while accuracy scales monotonically, and quantization can improve robustness to natural perturbations.

  3. Fair-GPTQ: Bias-Aware Quantization for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fair-GPTQ modifies GPTQ's quantization objective with a paired-stereotype bias penalty, reducing measured social bias in 4-bit models with modest accuracy loss.

  4. Examining the Efficacy of Graph Neural Network Message-Passing in Regression Contexts

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Across four NAS/DNN-predictor regression benchmarks, GEN (deep graph convolution) achieves the best average rank over 11 GNN message-passing layers, though attention GATv2 wins on the largest graphs.

Pith tools