REVIEW 4 cited by
Compressing LLMs: The Truth is Rarely Pure and Never Simple
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Despite their remarkable achievements, modern Large Language Models (LLMs) face exorbitant computational and memory footprints. Recently, several works have shown significant success in training-free and data-free compression (pruning and quantization) of LLMs that achieve 50 - 60% sparsity and reduce the bit width to 3 or 4 bits per weight, with negligible degradation of perplexity over the uncompressed baseline. As recent research efforts are focused on developing increasingly sophisticated compression methods, our work takes a step back and re-evaluates the effectiveness of existing SoTA compression methods, which rely on a fairly simple and widely questioned metric, perplexity (even for dense LLMs). We introduce Knowledge-Intensive Compressed LLM BenchmarK (LLM-KICK), a collection of carefully curated tasks to redefine the evaluation protocol for compressed LLMs, which have significant alignment with their dense counterparts and perplexity fail to capture subtle change in their true capabilities. LLM-KICK unveils many favorable merits and unfortunate plights of current SoTA compression methods: all pruning methods suffer significant performance degradation, sometimes at trivial sparsity ratios (e.g., 25-30%), and fail for N:M sparsity in knowledge-intensive tasks; current quantization methods are more successful than pruning; yet, pruned LLMs even at $\geq 50$% sparsity are robust in-context retrieval and summarization systems; among others. LLM-KICK is designed to holistically access compressed LLMs' ability for language understanding, reasoning, generation, in-context retrieval, in-context summarization, etc. We hope our study can foster the development of better LLM compression methods. The reproduced codes are available at https://github.com/VITA-Group/llm-kick.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Activation Approximations Can Incur Safety Vulnerabilities Even in Aligned LLMs: Comprehensive Analysis and Defense
Activation approximations used for faster LLM inference can dramatically increase jailbreak success rates on aligned models, and the paper's QuadA training method restores robust refusal.
-
Reliability Scaling Laws for Quantized Large Language Models
Reliability of quantized LLMs peaks nonlinearly at 4-bit precision under fixed total model bits, while accuracy scales monotonically, and quantization can improve robustness to natural perturbations.
-
Fair-GPTQ: Bias-Aware Quantization for Large Language Models
Fair-GPTQ modifies GPTQ's quantization objective with a paired-stereotype bias penalty, reducing measured social bias in 4-bit models with modest accuracy loss.
-
Examining the Efficacy of Graph Neural Network Message-Passing in Regression Contexts
Across four NAS/DNN-predictor regression benchmarks, GEN (deep graph convolution) achieves the best average rank over 11 GNN message-passing layers, though attention GATv2 wins on the largest graphs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.