Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LILAC: Log Parsing using LLMs with Adaptive Parsing Cache

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.01796 v3 pith:RY3PRY2T submitted 2023-10-03 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords parsinglilacllmscacheadaptivetemplatesaccuracydata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Log parsing transforms log messages into structured formats, serving as the prerequisite step for various log analysis tasks. Although a variety of log parsing approaches have been proposed, their performance on complicated log data remains compromised due to the use of human-crafted rules or learning-based models with limited training data. The recent emergence of powerful large language models (LLMs) demonstrates their vast pre-trained knowledge related to code and logging, making it promising to apply LLMs for log parsing. However, their lack of specialized log parsing capabilities currently hinders their accuracy in parsing. Moreover, the inherent inconsistent answers, as well as the substantial overhead, prevent the practical adoption of LLM-based log parsing. To address these challenges, we propose LILAC, the first practical log parsing framework using LLMs with adaptive parsing cache. To facilitate accurate and robust log parsing, LILAC leverages the in-context learning (ICL) capability of the LLM by performing a hierarchical candidate sampling algorithm and selecting high-quality demonstrations. Furthermore, LILAC incorporates a novel component, an adaptive parsing cache, to store and refine the templates generated by the LLM. It helps mitigate LLM's inefficiency issue by enabling rapid retrieval of previously processed log templates. In this process, LILAC adaptively updates the templates within the parsing cache to ensure the consistency of parsed results. The extensive evaluation on public large-scale datasets shows that LILAC outperforms state-of-the-art methods by 69.5% in terms of the average F1 score of template accuracy. In addition, LILAC reduces the query times to LLMs by several orders of magnitude, achieving a comparable efficiency to the fastest baseline.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PDLogger: Automated Logging Framework for Practical Software Development

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PDLogger generates complete multi-log statements for Java methods by combining block-aware LLM prompts, backward slicing, and refinement, outperforming prior single-log tools.

  2. A Survey on Evaluating Quality and Trustworthiness in LLM-Generated Data

    cs.AI 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A metric-oriented survey that classifies intrinsic quality and trustworthiness metrics for LLM-generated data across six modalities and documents systematic evaluation gaps in the current literature.

  3. LLM-based event log analysis techniques: A survey

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper organizes existing LLM event-log analysis research into a task taxonomy, identifies common limitations, and lists future research directions.

Pith tools