Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Variable selection with FDR control for noisy data -- an application to screening metabolites that are associated with breast and colorectal cancer

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.06696 v1 pith:PY7GBWWH submitted 2023-10-10 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords dataassociatedcancerdiseasemetabolitesapplicationassociationbreast
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapidly expanding field of metabolomics presents an invaluable resource for understanding the associations between metabolites and various diseases. However, the high dimensionality, presence of missing values, and measurement errors associated with metabolomics data can present challenges in developing reliable and reproducible methodologies for disease association studies. Therefore, there is a compelling need to develop robust statistical methods that can navigate these complexities to achieve reliable and reproducible disease association studies. In this paper, we focus on developing such a methodology with an emphasis on controlling the False Discovery Rate during the screening of mutual metabolomic signals for multiple disease outcomes. We illustrate the versatility and performance of this procedure in a variety of scenarios, dealing with missing data and measurement errors. As a specific application of this novel methodology, we target two of the most prevalent cancers among US women: breast cancer and colorectal cancer. By applying our method to the Wome's Health Initiative data, we successfully identify metabolites that are associated with either or both of these cancers, demonstrating the practical utility and potential of our method in identifying consistent risk factors and understanding shared mechanisms between diseases.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Short Note of Comparison between Convex and Non-convex Penalized Likelihood

    stat.ME 2025-02 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    Lasso is convex and fast but biased; SCAD and MCP reduce bias but are non-convex and slower, so method choice depends on context.

Pith tools