Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Geographic Location Encoding with Spherical Harmonics and Sinusoidal Representation Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.06743 v2 pith:LSYFTONQ submitted 2023-10-10 cs.LG cs.AI

Geographic Location Encoding with Spherical Harmonics and Sinusoidal Representation Networks

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords datanetworkssphericalembeddingsneuralrepresentationsinusoidalacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Learning representations of geographical space is vital for any machine learning model that integrates geolocated data, spanning application domains such as remote sensing, ecology, or epidemiology. Recent work embeds coordinates using sine and cosine projections based on Double Fourier Sphere (DFS) features. These embeddings assume a rectangular data domain even on global data, which can lead to artifacts, especially at the poles. At the same time, little attention has been paid to the exact design of the neural network architectures with which these functional embeddings are combined. This work proposes a novel location encoder for globally distributed geographic data that combines spherical harmonic basis functions, natively defined on spherical surfaces, with sinusoidal representation networks (SirenNets) that can be interpreted as learned Double Fourier Sphere embedding. We systematically evaluate positional embeddings and neural network architectures across various benchmarks and synthetic evaluation datasets. In contrast to previous approaches that require the combination of both positional encoding and neural networks to learn meaningful representations, we show that both spherical harmonics and sinusoidal representation networks are competitive on their own but set state-of-the-art performances across tasks when combined. The model code and experiments are available at https://github.com/marccoru/locationencoder.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Enhancing the KidSat Model: Integrating Geographical Encoding and Data Quality Assessment for Childhood Poverty Prediction

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Refined DHS targets, two-stage image-quality screening, and spherical-harmonic geo-encoding reduce KidSat MAE from 0.2167 to 0.1759 (18.83 percent relative) and reach 0.1658 on 33 African countries.

  2. Otter Weather: Skillful and Computationally Efficient Medium-Range Weather Forecasting

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Otter Weather is a spatiotemporal model that outperforms NWP baselines by 9.6% at 24h lead with under 3.5 A100-days training and extends efficiency gains to probabilistic forecasting via CRPS.

  3. Do Location Encoders Capture Spatial Effects? A GeoShapley Benchmark Across Scales

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Benchmark finds location encoders recover primary spatial coefficients consistently but secondary ones vary by scale, with raw-coordinate baseline competitive throughout.