Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On $(1+\varepsilon)$-Approximate Flow Sparsifiers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.07857 v1 pith:NSZMOQFT submitted 2023-10-11 cs.DS

classification cs.DS
keywords flowsparsifiersvarepsiloncontraction-basedgraphquality-sizeconstructing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Given a large graph $G$ with a subset $|T|=k$ of its vertices called terminals, a quality-$q$ flow sparsifier is a small graph $G'$ that contains $T$ and preserves all multicommodity flows that can be routed between terminals in $T$, to within factor $q$. The problem of constructing flow sparsifiers with good (small) quality and (small) size has been a central problem in graph compression for decades. A natural approach of constructing $O(1)$-quality flow sparsifiers, which was adopted in most previous constructions, is contraction. Andoni, Krauthgamer, and Gupta constructed a sketch of size $f(k,\varepsilon)$ that stores all feasible multicommodity flows up to a factor of $(1+\varepsilon)$, raised the question of constructing quality-$(1+\varepsilon)$ flow sparsifiers whose size only depends on $k,\varepsilon$ (but not the number of vertices in the input graph $G$), and proposed a contraction-based framework towards it using their sketch result. In this paper, we settle their question for contraction-based flow sparsifiers, by showing that quality-$(1+\varepsilon)$ contraction-based flow sparsifiers with size $f(\varepsilon)$ exist for all $5$-terminal graphs, but not for all $6$-terminal graphs. Our hardness result on $6$-terminal graphs improves upon a recent hardness result by Krauthgamer and Mosenzon on exact (quality-$1$) flow sparsifiers, for contraction-based constructions. Our construction and proof utilize the notion of tight spans in metric geometry, which we believe is a powerful tool for future work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TCS-BENCH: Benchmarking State-of-the-Art Generative AI Theoretical Computer Science Research Ability

    cs.CL 2026-08 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper introduces TCS-Bench, a 300-task proof-generation benchmark from top TCS papers, and reports frontier LLM accuracies from 30% to 68% using an automated verifier.

  2. Paths and Intersections: Minimum Realization of Okamura-Seymour Instances

    cs.DS 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Every OS metric has a unique minimum-crossing medial template; its primal arrangements are precisely the fewest-edge disk realizations, recoverable with realizing lengths in polynomial time.

Pith tools