Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Last One Standing: A Comparative Analysis of Security and Privacy of Soft Prompt Tuning, LoRA, and In-Context Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.11397 v1 pith:ZVTDSAPW submitted 2023-10-17 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords privacysecurityadaptationdatallmslorabeencomparative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful tools for natural language processing, enabling novel applications and user experiences. However, to achieve optimal performance, LLMs often require adaptation with private data, which poses privacy and security challenges. Several techniques have been proposed to adapt LLMs with private data, such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), Soft Prompt Tuning (SPT), and In-Context Learning (ICL), but their comparative privacy and security properties have not been systematically investigated. In this work, we fill this gap by evaluating the robustness of LoRA, SPT, and ICL against three types of well-established attacks: membership inference, which exposes data leakage (privacy); backdoor, which injects malicious behavior (security); and model stealing, which can violate intellectual property (privacy and security). Our results show that there is no silver bullet for privacy and security in LLM adaptation and each technique has different strengths and weaknesses.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How Context Attribution Handles What the Model Already Knows

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Context attribution methods cannot disentangle in-context from in-weight knowledge and assign unfaithful scores under overlap; new metrics and WMDP-Cyber++ quantify the failure.

  2. Membership Inference Attacks on In-Context Examples in LLM-based Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Simply asking a large language model 'have you seen this user?' or comparing its recommendations after prompt poisoning can reveal whether a user's interactions are in the hidden prompt of an ICL-based recommender.

  3. SoK: Data Reconstruction Attacks Against Machine Learning Models: Definition, Metrics, and Benchmark

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors define data reconstruction attacks and measure them with dataset-level FID, sample-level distance and coverage, and an LLM visual judge, finding reconstruction quality tracks memorization.

Pith tools