Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.11440 v3 pith:TNDWLB4H submitted 2023-10-17 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords modelsmetricslargegenerationgenerativequalitiesvideoalignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The vision and language generative models have been overgrown in recent years. For video generation, various open-sourced models and public-available services have been developed to generate high-quality videos. However, these methods often use a few metrics, e.g., FVD or IS, to evaluate the performance. We argue that it is hard to judge the large conditional generative models from the simple metrics since these models are often trained on very large datasets with multi-aspect abilities. Thus, we propose a novel framework and pipeline for exhaustively evaluating the performance of the generated videos. Our approach involves generating a diverse and comprehensive list of 700 prompts for text-to-video generation, which is based on an analysis of real-world user data and generated with the assistance of a large language model. Then, we evaluate the state-of-the-art video generative models on our carefully designed benchmark, in terms of visual qualities, content qualities, motion qualities, and text-video alignment with 17 well-selected objective metrics. To obtain the final leaderboard of the models, we further fit a series of coefficients to align the objective metrics to the users' opinions. Based on the proposed human alignment method, our final score shows a higher correlation than simply averaging the metrics, showing the effectiveness of the proposed evaluation method.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. KeyFrame-Compass: Towards Comprehensive Evaluation of Keyframe-Conditioned Video Generation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    KeyFrame-Compass tests nine video generators on 386 keyframe-sequence tasks and finds a consistent trade-off between keyframe fidelity and natural video quality, with control degrading under dense keyframes and open-s...

  2. AIGVE-MACS: Unified Multi-Aspect Commenting and Scoring Model for AI-Generated Video Evaluation

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A finetuned vision-language model jointly predicts nine aspect scores and written comments for AI-generated videos, with a new benchmark and claims of state-of-the-art alignment with human judgment.

  3. PAROAttention: Pattern-Aware ReOrdering for Efficient Sparse and Quantized Attention in Visual Generation Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    PAROAttention permutes tokens along frame, height, and width axes to make visual attention block-wise, enabling sparse and INT8/INT4 quantized attention with near-baseline generation quality.

Pith tools