Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

To Generate or Not? Safety-Driven Unlearned Diffusion Models Are Still Easy To Generate Unsafe Images ... For Now

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.11868 v4 pith:UWFODTOO submitted 2023-10-18 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords adversarialmodelssafety-drivenunlearningconceptsdiffusiongenerationprompts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The recent advances in diffusion models (DMs) have revolutionized the generation of realistic and complex images. However, these models also introduce potential safety hazards, such as producing harmful content and infringing data copyrights. Despite the development of safety-driven unlearning techniques to counteract these challenges, doubts about their efficacy persist. To tackle this issue, we introduce an evaluation framework that leverages adversarial prompts to discern the trustworthiness of these safety-driven DMs after they have undergone the process of unlearning harmful concepts. Specifically, we investigated the adversarial robustness of DMs, assessed by adversarial prompts, when eliminating unwanted concepts, styles, and objects. We develop an effective and efficient adversarial prompt generation approach for DMs, termed UnlearnDiffAtk. This method capitalizes on the intrinsic classification abilities of DMs to simplify the creation of adversarial prompts, thereby eliminating the need for auxiliary classification or diffusion models. Through extensive benchmarking, we evaluate the robustness of widely-used safety-driven unlearned DMs (i.e., DMs after unlearning undesirable concepts, styles, or objects) across a variety of tasks. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency merits of UnlearnDiffAtk over the state-of-the-art adversarial prompt generation method and reveal the lack of robustness of current safetydriven unlearning techniques when applied to DMs. Codes are available at https://github.com/OPTML-Group/Diffusion-MU-Attack. WARNING: There exist AI generations that may be offensive in nature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PLA: Prompt Learning Attack against Text-to-Image Generative Models

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PLA trains adversarial prompts with a zero-order gradient method and multimodal CLIP losses to bypass safety filters and post-hoc checkers in black-box text-to-image models, outperforming earlier word-substitution attacks.

  2. Concept Pinpoint Eraser for Text-to-image Diffusion Models via Residual Attention Gate

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CPE uses nonlinear residual attention gates with anchoring and adversarial training to erase target concepts from text-to-image diffusion models while preserving remaining concepts better than prior fine-tuning methods.

  3. PRJ: Perception-Retrieval-Judgement for Generated Images

    cs.CV 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A new safety checker for AI-generated images, built from a vision-language model, retrieval-augmented knowledge lookup, and an LLM judge, reports higher detection rates and category-level toxicity scores than three ex...

  4. When Data Manipulation Meets Attack Goals: An In-depth Survey of Attacks for VLMs

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey that classifies VLM attacks by goal and data manipulation strategy, and reviews defenses and metrics.

Pith tools