Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

T5 meets Tybalt: Author Attribution in Early Modern English Drama Using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.18454 v1 pith:3N6HLKNO submitted 2023-10-27 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords authorauthorsdramaearlyenglishlanguagelargemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models have shown breakthrough potential in many NLP domains. Here we consider their use for stylometry, specifically authorship identification in Early Modern English drama. We find both promising and concerning results; LLMs are able to accurately predict the author of surprisingly short passages but are also prone to confidently misattribute texts to specific authors. A fine-tuned t5-large model outperforms all tested baselines, including logistic regression, SVM with a linear kernel, and cosine delta, at attributing small passages. However, we see indications that the presence of certain authors in the model's pre-training data affects predictive results in ways that are difficult to assess.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stylometry recognizes human and LLM-generated texts in short samples

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Stylometric features and tree-based classifiers separate human-written Wikipedia summaries from LLM-generated texts with high cross-validated accuracy on a new seven-class benchmark, though performance drops on other ...

  2. Trends and Challenges in Authorship Analysis: A Review of ML, DL, and LLM Approaches

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 93 papers on authorship analysis, summarizing ML, DL, and LLM methods, datasets, and open challenges from 2015 to 2024.

Pith tools