REVIEW 5 cited by
Foundational Models in Medical Imaging: A Comprehensive Survey and Future Vision
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Foundation models, large-scale, pre-trained deep-learning models adapted to a wide range of downstream tasks have gained significant interest lately in various deep-learning problems undergoing a paradigm shift with the rise of these models. Trained on large-scale dataset to bridge the gap between different modalities, foundation models facilitate contextual reasoning, generalization, and prompt capabilities at test time. The predictions of these models can be adjusted for new tasks by augmenting the model input with task-specific hints called prompts without requiring extensive labeled data and retraining. Capitalizing on the advances in computer vision, medical imaging has also marked a growing interest in these models. To assist researchers in navigating this direction, this survey intends to provide a comprehensive overview of foundation models in the domain of medical imaging. Specifically, we initiate our exploration by providing an exposition of the fundamental concepts forming the basis of foundation models. Subsequently, we offer a methodical taxonomy of foundation models within the medical domain, proposing a classification system primarily structured around training strategies, while also incorporating additional facets such as application domains, imaging modalities, specific organs of interest, and the algorithms integral to these models. Furthermore, we emphasize the practical use case of some selected approaches and then discuss the opportunities, applications, and future directions of these large-scale pre-trained models, for analyzing medical images. In the same vein, we address the prevailing challenges and research pathways associated with foundational models in medical imaging. These encompass the areas of interpretability, data management, computational requirements, and the nuanced issue of contextual comprehension.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
In-Context Learning for Wound Classification with Small Multimodal Language Models
Retrieval-based in-context learning, not zero-shot prompting, drives wound-classification gains in small multimodal models, with Qwen 3.5 27B reaching 0.872 accuracy on Kaggle and 0.678 on Medetec.
-
Towards Robust Foundation Models for Digital Pathology
PathoROB shows that all 20 evaluated pathology foundation models encode medical center information and that lower robustness correlates with larger downstream performance drops.
-
Is an Ultra Large Natural Image-Based Foundation Model Superior to a Retina-Specific Model for Detecting Ocular and Systemic Diseases?
A head-to-head benchmark shows DINOv2 generally outperforms RETFound on ocular disease detection, while RETFound is superior for predicting systemic disease incidence from retinal images.
-
Benchmarking Foundation Models for Zero-Shot Biometric Tasks
A benchmark of 41 foundation models shows CLIP/OpenCLIP/BLIP2 embeddings reach near-90% zero-shot face verification and DINO reaches 97.55% on IITD-R iris without fine-tuning.
-
Foundational Models and Federated Learning: Survey, Taxonomy, Challenges and Practical Insights
A survey that maps methods for combining foundation models with federated learning into a training-customization-deployment taxonomy with practical ratings.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.