Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CROMA: Remote Sensing Representations with Contrastive Radar-Optical Masked Autoencoders

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.00566 v1 pith:UTVQUNAC submitted 2023-11-01 cs.CV

CROMA: Remote Sensing Representations with Contrastive Radar-Optical Masked Autoencoders

classification cs.CV
keywords multimodalcromarepresentationsalignedcontrastiveremotesensingspatially
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

A vital and rapidly growing application, remote sensing offers vast yet sparsely labeled, spatially aligned multimodal data; this makes self-supervised learning algorithms invaluable. We present CROMA: a framework that combines contrastive and reconstruction self-supervised objectives to learn rich unimodal and multimodal representations. Our method separately encodes masked-out multispectral optical and synthetic aperture radar samples -- aligned in space and time -- and performs cross-modal contrastive learning. Another encoder fuses these sensors, producing joint multimodal encodings that are used to predict the masked patches via a lightweight decoder. We show that these objectives are complementary when leveraged on spatially aligned multimodal data. We also introduce X- and 2D-ALiBi, which spatially biases our cross- and self-attention matrices. These strategies improve representations and allow our models to effectively extrapolate to images up to 17.6x larger at test-time. CROMA outperforms the current SoTA multispectral model, evaluated on: four classification benchmarks -- finetuning (avg. 1.8%), linear (avg. 2.4%) and nonlinear (avg. 1.4%) probing, kNN classification (avg. 3.5%), and K-means clustering (avg. 8.4%); and three segmentation benchmarks (avg. 6.4%). CROMA's rich, optionally multimodal representations can be widely leveraged across remote sensing applications.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The View From Space: Navigating Instrumentation Differences with EOFMs

    cs.CV 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    EOFM embeddings are strongly partitioned by sensor architecture, so matching spectral bands is not enough to make cross-sensor embedding search reliable.

  2. LunarFM: A Shared Multimodal Representation of the Moon's Surface

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A self-supervised multimodal model fuses 18 channels from six lunar instruments into a shared 768-dimensional embedding per 0.5° chip, enabling mineral regression, similarity search, and geological-unit classification...

  3. Scalable and Trustworthy Earth Observation Foundation Models

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0

    Remote-sensing foundation models need domain-specific design and evaluation around measurement physics and decision constraints; benchmark accuracy alone is insufficient for trustworthy EO deployment.