Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Blessing of Randomness: SDE Beats ODE in General Diffusion-based Image Editing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.01410 v2 pith:QOXRLPJY submitted 2023-11-02 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords editingdiffusion-basedimageformulationcorrespondingdragbenchmarginalmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a unified probabilistic formulation for diffusion-based image editing, where a latent variable is edited in a task-specific manner and generally deviates from the corresponding marginal distribution induced by the original stochastic or ordinary differential equation (SDE or ODE). Instead, it defines a corresponding SDE or ODE for editing. In the formulation, we prove that the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the marginal distributions of the two SDEs gradually decreases while that for the ODEs remains as the time approaches zero, which shows the promise of SDE in image editing. Inspired by it, we provide the SDE counterparts for widely used ODE baselines in various tasks including inpainting and image-to-image translation, where SDE shows a consistent and substantial improvement. Moreover, we propose SDE-Drag -- a simple yet effective method built upon the SDE formulation for point-based content dragging. We build a challenging benchmark (termed DragBench) with open-set natural, art, and AI-generated images for evaluation. A user study on DragBench indicates that SDE-Drag significantly outperforms our ODE baseline, existing diffusion-based methods, and the renowned DragGAN. Our results demonstrate the superiority and versatility of SDE in image editing and push the boundary of diffusion-based editing methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Inpaint4Drag: Repurposing Inpainting Models for Drag-Based Image Editing via Bidirectional Warping

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Drag-based editing becomes pixel-space bidirectional warping plus inpainting, giving real-time previews and 0.3s final edits at 512x512.

  2. SeedEdit 3.0: Fast and High-Quality Generative Image Editing

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    SeedEdit 3.0 reports a 56.1% usability rate on internal real-image editing tests, beating SeedEdit 1.6, GPT-4o, and Gemini 2.0, with 8x faster inference after distillation and quantization.

Pith tools