REVIEW 4 cited by
Sensitivity of JWST to eV-Scale Decaying Axion Dark Matter
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The recently-launched James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) can resolve eV-scale emission lines arising from dark matter (DM) decay. We forecast the end-of-mission sensitivity to the decay of axions, a leading DM candidate, in the Milky Way using the blank-sky observations expected during standard operations. Searching for unassociated emission lines will constrain axions in the mass range $0.18$ eV to $2.6$ eV with axion-photon couplings $g_{a\gamma\gamma}\gtrsim 5.5 \times 10^{-12}$ GeV$^{-1}$. In particular, these results will constrain astrophobic QCD axions to masses $\lesssim$ 0.2 eV.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Search for Dark Matter Annihilation and Decay with H$\alpha$ Line Emission
H-alpha line emission from recombining gas in quiet dwarf galaxies is a new probe of dark matter annihilation/decay, giving leading limits for some dark matter masses.
-
Dark Matter Haloscope with a Disordered Dielectric Absorber
A disordered dielectric powder can act as a broadband dark-matter-to-photon conversion target, and the proposed DPHaSE experiment could probe QCD axions and dark photons in the 10 meV to 1 eV range.
-
Searching for Axion Dark Matter Near Relaxing Magnetars
Resonant axion-to-photon conversion near magnetars could be observable with ALMA and SKA, but the predicted line strength and frequency depend heavily on which plasma model is correct.
-
Neutrino lines and photon continua from cascade dark matter decay
In cascade dark-matter decay, neutrino-line searches can beat gamma-ray limits whenever the intermediate mediator is long-lived enough to suppress the photon flux.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.