REVIEW 3 cited by
Combating Misinformation in the Age of LLMs: Opportunities and Challenges
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Misinformation such as fake news and rumors is a serious threat on information ecosystems and public trust. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has great potential to reshape the landscape of combating misinformation. Generally, LLMs can be a double-edged sword in the fight. On the one hand, LLMs bring promising opportunities for combating misinformation due to their profound world knowledge and strong reasoning abilities. Thus, one emergent question is: how to utilize LLMs to combat misinformation? On the other hand, the critical challenge is that LLMs can be easily leveraged to generate deceptive misinformation at scale. Then, another important question is: how to combat LLM-generated misinformation? In this paper, we first systematically review the history of combating misinformation before the advent of LLMs. Then we illustrate the current efforts and present an outlook for these two fundamental questions respectively. The goal of this survey paper is to facilitate the progress of utilizing LLMs for fighting misinformation and call for interdisciplinary efforts from different stakeholders for combating LLM-generated misinformation.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Communication is All You Need: Persuasion Dataset Construction via Multi-LLM Communication
A six-role multi-LLM communication framework generates persuasive dialogue data that human judges find nearly indistinguishable from human-written rewrites.
-
Calibrated Selective Fact-Checking via Evidence Chain Evaluation
A tool-using LLM fact-checker that abstains on 6 of 95 claims reaches 97.8% accuracy on answered claims, but a simpler search baseline remains more accurate and better calibrated.
-
Multi-agent Systems for Misinformation Lifecycle : Detection, Correction And Source Identification
A conceptual multi-agent architecture for classifying, detecting, correcting, and sourcing misinformation is proposed but not implemented or evaluated.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.