Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Controllable Topic-Focused Abstractive Summarization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.06724 v1 pith:74WB5PSC submitted 2023-11-12 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords abstractivemodelsummarizationsummariestopic-focusedarchitecturecross-attentionmechanism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Controlled abstractive summarization focuses on producing condensed versions of a source article to cover specific aspects by shifting the distribution of generated text towards a desired style, e.g., a set of topics. Subsequently, the resulting summaries may be tailored to user-defined requirements. This paper presents a new Transformer-based architecture capable of producing topic-focused summaries. The architecture modifies the cross-attention mechanism of the Transformer to bring topic-focus control to the generation process while not adding any further parameters to the model. We show that our model sets a new state of the art on the NEWTS dataset in terms of topic-focused abstractive summarization as well as a topic-prevalence score. Moreover, we show via extensive experiments that our proposed topical cross-attention mechanism can be plugged into various Transformer models, such as BART and T5, improving their performance on the CNN/Dailymail and XSum benchmark datasets for abstractive summarization. This is achieved via fine-tuning, without requiring training from scratch. Finally, we show through human evaluation that our model generates more faithful summaries outperforming the state-of-the-art Frost model.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Understanding (Un)Reliability of Steering Vectors in Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Steering vectors are unreliable when the target behavior does not correspond to a coherent, well-separated linear direction in activation space, and this coherence can be measured from training data.

  2. Logit Reweighting for Topic-Focused Summarization

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Logit reweighting, especially a threshold rule that boosts likely topic tokens, increases topic-vocabulary use in summaries from Gemma-2B and Llama-3-8B with little measured quality loss.

Pith tools